diff for duplicates of <20191003193632.GK87296@google.com>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index 500533e..54a0146 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -64,3 +64,8 @@ see what devfreq maintainers think.
 
 In any case the patch should be fine as is, since it doesn't introduce the
 (IMO) odd behavior.
+
+_______________________________________________
+linux-arm-kernel mailing list
+linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
+http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index 38ae77c..94f3946 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -6,21 +6,21 @@
  "Subject\0Re: [PATCH v9 6/8] PM / devfreq: Introduce get_freq_range helper\0"
  "Date\0Thu, 3 Oct 2019 12:36:32 -0700\0"
  "To\0Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@nxp.com>\0"
- "Cc\0Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>"
+ "Cc\0Artur \305\232wigo\305\204 <a.swigon@partner.samsung.com>"
+  Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@nxp.com>
   Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>
+  linux-pm@vger.kernel.org <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
+  Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
+  dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@nxp.com>
+  Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
+  Lukasz Luba <l.luba@partner.samsung.com>
   Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
-  MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>
   Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
- " Artur \305\232wigo\305\204 <a.swigon@partner.samsung.com>"
-  Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
+  MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>
   Alexandre Bailon <abailon@baylibre.com>
   Georgi Djakov <georgi.djakov@linaro.org>
-  Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@nxp.com>
-  Jacky Bai <ping.bai@nxp.com>
-  Lukasz Luba <l.luba@partner.samsung.com>
-  dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@nxp.com>
-  linux-pm@vger.kernel.org <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
- " linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>\0"
+  linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
+ " Jacky Bai <ping.bai@nxp.com>\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "On Thu, Oct 03, 2019 at 07:16:03PM +0000, Leonard Crestez wrote:\n"
@@ -88,6 +88,11 @@
  "see what devfreq maintainers think.\n"
  "\n"
  "In any case the patch should be fine as is, since it doesn't introduce the\n"
- (IMO) odd behavior.
+ "(IMO) odd behavior.\n"
+ "\n"
+ "_______________________________________________\n"
+ "linux-arm-kernel mailing list\n"
+ "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\n"
+ http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
 
-4fdf0a396b66ab314d6dd45fac09292d959b6a07bcca95caaa97b7779438186b
+ffa8ec66f622e00e7f9457d4c8d6754b2bebee802e60d18438abeb500345c9d0
