From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Swati Sharma <swati2.sharma@intel.com>
Cc: jani.nikula@intel.com, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915/color: move check of gamma_enable to specific func/platform
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2019 23:14:32 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191004201432.GL1208@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191004082610.24664-3-swati2.sharma@intel.com>
On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 01:56:08PM +0530, Swati Sharma wrote:
> Moved common code to check gamma_enable to specific funcs per platform
> in bit_precision func. icl doesn't support that and chv has separate
> enable knob for CGM LUT.
>
> Signed-off-by: Swati Sharma <swati2.sharma@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.c
> index 8f02313a7fef..44ce75f051ad 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.c
> @@ -1420,6 +1420,9 @@ static int icl_color_check(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>
> static int i9xx_gamma_precision(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> {
> + if (!crtc_state->gamma_enable)
> + return 0;
> +
> switch (crtc_state->gamma_mode) {
> case GAMMA_MODE_MODE_8BIT:
> return 8;
> @@ -1433,6 +1436,9 @@ static int i9xx_gamma_precision(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>
> static int ilk_gamma_precision(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> {
> + if (!crtc_state->gamma_enable)
> + return 0;
> +
> if ((crtc_state->csc_mode & CSC_POSITION_BEFORE_GAMMA) == 0)
> return 0;
>
> @@ -1449,14 +1455,24 @@ static int ilk_gamma_precision(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>
> static int chv_gamma_precision(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> {
> - if (crtc_state->cgm_mode & CGM_PIPE_MODE_GAMMA)
> - return 10;
> + if (crtc_state->cgm_mode) {
> + if ((crtc_state->cgm_mode & CGM_PIPE_MODE_GAMMA) == 0)
> + return 0;
> + else
> + return 10;
> + }
> +
> + if (!crtc_state->gamma_enable)
> + return 0;
> else
> return i9xx_gamma_precision(crtc_state);
Again could simplify to just:
if (crtc_state->cgm_mode & CGM_PIPE_MODE_GAMMA)
return 10;
else
return i9xx_gamma_precision(crtc_state);
> }
>
> static int glk_gamma_precision(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> {
> + if (!crtc_state->gamma_enable)
> + return 0;
> +
> switch (crtc_state->gamma_mode) {
> case GAMMA_MODE_MODE_8BIT:
> return 8;
> @@ -1473,9 +1489,6 @@ int intel_color_get_gamma_bit_precision(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_stat
> struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc_state->base.crtc);
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
>
> - if (!crtc_state->gamma_enable)
> - return 0;
> -
> if (HAS_GMCH(dev_priv)) {
> if (IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev_priv))
> return chv_gamma_precision(crtc_state);
> --
> 2.23.0
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-04 20:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-04 8:26 [PATCH 0/4] fix broken state checker and enable state checker for icl+ Swati Sharma
2019-10-04 8:26 ` [PATCH 1/4] [v2] drm/i915/color: fix broken gamma state-checker during boot Swati Sharma
2019-10-04 20:12 ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-10-04 8:26 ` [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915/color: move check of gamma_enable to specific func/platform Swati Sharma
2019-10-04 20:14 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2019-10-04 8:26 ` [PATCH 3/4] [v5] drm/i915/color: Extract icl_read_luts() Swati Sharma
2019-10-04 8:26 ` [PATCH 4/4] FOR_TESTING_ONLY: Print rgb values of hw and sw blobs Swati Sharma
2019-10-04 9:29 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for fix broken state checker and enable state checker for icl+ Patchwork
2019-10-04 11:12 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2019-10-04 14:01 ` [PATCH 0/4] " Saarinen, Jani
2019-10-04 15:20 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191004201432.GL1208@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=swati2.sharma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.