From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net 4/4] llc: fix sk_buff refcounting in llc_conn_state_process()
Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2019 14:24:27 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191006212427.427682-5-ebiggers@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191006212427.427682-1-ebiggers@kernel.org>
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
If llc_conn_state_process() sees that llc_conn_service() put the skb on
a list, it will drop one fewer references to it. This is wrong because
the current behavior is that llc_conn_service() never consumes a
reference to the skb.
The code also makes the number of skb references being dropped
conditional on which of ind_prim and cfm_prim are nonzero, yet neither
of these affects how many references are *acquired*. So there is extra
code that tries to fix this up by sometimes taking another reference.
Remove the unnecessary/broken refcounting logic and instead just add an
skb_get() before the only two places where an extra reference is
actually consumed.
Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
---
net/llc/llc_conn.c | 33 ++++++---------------------------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/llc/llc_conn.c b/net/llc/llc_conn.c
index 0b0c6f12153b..a79b739eb223 100644
--- a/net/llc/llc_conn.c
+++ b/net/llc/llc_conn.c
@@ -64,12 +64,6 @@ int llc_conn_state_process(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
struct llc_sock *llc = llc_sk(skb->sk);
struct llc_conn_state_ev *ev = llc_conn_ev(skb);
- /*
- * We have to hold the skb, because llc_conn_service will kfree it in
- * the sending path and we need to look at the skb->cb, where we encode
- * llc_conn_state_ev.
- */
- skb_get(skb);
ev->ind_prim = ev->cfm_prim = 0;
/*
* Send event to state machine
@@ -77,21 +71,12 @@ int llc_conn_state_process(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
rc = llc_conn_service(skb->sk, skb);
if (unlikely(rc != 0)) {
printk(KERN_ERR "%s: llc_conn_service failed\n", __func__);
- goto out_kfree_skb;
- }
-
- if (unlikely(!ev->ind_prim && !ev->cfm_prim)) {
- /* indicate or confirm not required */
- if (!skb->next)
- goto out_kfree_skb;
goto out_skb_put;
}
- if (unlikely(ev->ind_prim && ev->cfm_prim)) /* Paranoia */
- skb_get(skb);
-
switch (ev->ind_prim) {
case LLC_DATA_PRIM:
+ skb_get(skb);
llc_save_primitive(sk, skb, LLC_DATA_PRIM);
if (unlikely(sock_queue_rcv_skb(sk, skb))) {
/*
@@ -108,6 +93,7 @@ int llc_conn_state_process(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
* skb->sk pointing to the newly created struct sock in
* llc_conn_handler. -acme
*/
+ skb_get(skb);
skb_queue_tail(&sk->sk_receive_queue, skb);
sk->sk_state_change(sk);
break;
@@ -123,7 +109,6 @@ int llc_conn_state_process(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
sk->sk_state_change(sk);
}
}
- kfree_skb(skb);
sock_put(sk);
break;
case LLC_RESET_PRIM:
@@ -132,14 +117,11 @@ int llc_conn_state_process(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
* RESET is not being notified to upper layers for now
*/
printk(KERN_INFO "%s: received a reset ind!\n", __func__);
- kfree_skb(skb);
break;
default:
- if (ev->ind_prim) {
+ if (ev->ind_prim)
printk(KERN_INFO "%s: received unknown %d prim!\n",
__func__, ev->ind_prim);
- kfree_skb(skb);
- }
/* No indication */
break;
}
@@ -181,15 +163,12 @@ int llc_conn_state_process(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
printk(KERN_INFO "%s: received a reset conf!\n", __func__);
break;
default:
- if (ev->cfm_prim) {
+ if (ev->cfm_prim)
printk(KERN_INFO "%s: received unknown %d prim!\n",
__func__, ev->cfm_prim);
- break;
- }
- goto out_skb_put; /* No confirmation */
+ /* No confirmation */
+ break;
}
-out_kfree_skb:
- kfree_skb(skb);
out_skb_put:
kfree_skb(skb);
return rc;
--
2.23.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-06 21:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-06 21:24 [PATCH net 0/4] llc: fix sk_buff refcounting Eric Biggers
2019-10-06 21:24 ` [PATCH net 1/4] llc: fix sk_buff leak in llc_sap_state_process() Eric Biggers
2019-10-06 21:24 ` [PATCH net 2/4] llc: fix sk_buff leak in llc_conn_service() Eric Biggers
2019-10-06 21:24 ` [PATCH net 3/4] llc: fix another potential sk_buff leak in llc_ui_sendmsg() Eric Biggers
2019-10-06 21:24 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2019-10-08 21:15 ` [PATCH net 0/4] llc: fix sk_buff refcounting Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191006212427.427682-5-ebiggers@kernel.org \
--to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.