From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: sagi@grimberg.me, ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, axboe@fb.com, kbusch@kernel.org,
hch@lst.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] nvme: retain split access workaround for capability reads
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2019 14:07:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191007120721.GA21060@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191007114253.30735-1-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 01:42:53PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> This fixes a boot issue on some ARM boxes with NVMe behind a Synopsys
> DesignWare PCIe host controller.
> static int nvme_pci_reg_read64(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl, u32 off, u64 *val)
> {
> - *val = readq(to_nvme_dev(ctrl)->bar + off);
> + /* use a split read to work around buggy interconnects */
> + *val = lo_hi_readq(to_nvme_dev(ctrl)->bar + off);
I though this was to fix back up the broken Apple controllers?
If you interconnect doesn't support 8-byte MMIO read/write TLPs you
have a much deeper problem, as this will break all drivers using
readq/writeq. And we currently only have compile time detection for
readq/writeq, not runtime so you'll have to invent a scheme if this
works at all or not.
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvme mailing list
Linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-07 12:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-07 11:42 [PATCH v3] nvme: retain split access workaround for capability reads Ard Biesheuvel
2019-10-07 12:07 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2019-10-07 12:24 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-10-07 12:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-10-07 12:32 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-10-07 12:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-10-07 12:48 ` Keith Busch
2019-10-07 13:20 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-10-07 13:32 ` Keith Busch
2019-10-07 13:33 ` Ard Biesheuvel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191007120721.GA21060@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=axboe@fb.com \
--cc=ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.