From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>,
RDMA mailing list <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>,
Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@mellanox.com>,
Yamin Friedman <yaminf@mellanox.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>,
linux-netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-next v1 2/3] RDMA/rw: Support threshold for registration vs scattering to local pages
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2019 16:17:06 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191007131706.GX5855@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191007124831.GA20840@infradead.org>
On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 05:48:31AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 03:36:56PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > > > if (rdma_protocol_iwarp(dev, port_num) && dir == DMA_FROM_DEVICE)
> > > > return true;
> > > > + if (dev->attrs.max_sgl_rd && dir == DMA_FROM_DEVICE &&
> > > > + dma_nents > dev->attrs.max_sgl_rd)
> > > > + return true;
> > >
> > > This can be simplified to:
> > >
> > > if (dir == DMA_FROM_DEVICE &&
> > > (rdma_protocol_iwarp(dev, port_num) ||
> > > (dev->attrs.max_sgl_rd && dma_nents > dev->attrs.max_sgl_rd)))
> > > return true;
> >
> > I don't think that it simplifies and wanted to make separate checks to
> > be separated. For example, rdma_protocol_iwarp() has nothing to do with
> > attrs.max_sgl_rd.
>
> The important bit is to have the DMA_FROM_DEVICE check only once, as
> we only do the registration for reads with either parameter. So if
> you want it more verbose the wya would be:
>
> if (dir == DMA_FROM_DEVICE) {
> if (rdma_protocol_iwarp(dev, port_num))
> return true;
> if (dev->attrs.max_sgl_rd && dma_nents > dev->attrs.max_sgl_rd)
> return true;
> }
I'm doing it now, Thank you for taking time to explain.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-07 13:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-07 11:58 [PATCH rdma-next v1 0/3] Optimize SGL registration Leon Romanovsky
2019-10-07 11:58 ` [PATCH mlx5-next v1 1/3] net/mlx5: Expose optimal performance scatter entries capability Leon Romanovsky
2019-10-07 11:58 ` [PATCH rdma-next v1 2/3] RDMA/rw: Support threshold for registration vs scattering to local pages Leon Romanovsky
2019-10-07 12:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-10-07 12:36 ` Leon Romanovsky
2019-10-07 12:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-10-07 13:17 ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
2019-10-07 11:58 ` [PATCH rdma-next v1 3/3] RDMA/mlx5: Add capability for max sge to get optimized performance Leon Romanovsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191007131706.GX5855@unreal \
--to=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=dledford@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jgg@mellanox.com \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ogerlitz@mellanox.com \
--cc=saeedm@mellanox.com \
--cc=yaminf@mellanox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.