From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Morten Rasmussen <Morten.Rasmussen@arm.com>,
Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/10] sched/fair: rework load_balance
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2019 19:39:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191008173910.GB22902@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191008153002.GA21999@linaro.org>
On Tue, Oct 08, 2019 at 05:30:02PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> This is how I plan to get ride of the problem:
> + if (busiest->group_weight == 1 || sds->prefer_sibling) {
> + unsigned int nr_diff = busiest->sum_h_nr_running;
> + /*
> + * When prefer sibling, evenly spread running tasks on
> + * groups.
> + */
> + env->migration_type = migrate_task;
> + lsub_positive(&nr_diff, local->sum_h_nr_running);
> + env->imbalance = nr_diff >> 1;
> + return;
> + }
I'm thinking the max_t(long, 0, ...); variant reads a lot simpler and
really _should_ work given that -fno-strict-overflow / -fwrapv mandates
2s complement.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-08 17:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-19 7:33 [PATCH v3 0/8] sched/fair: rework the CFS load balance Vincent Guittot
2019-09-19 7:33 ` [PATCH v3 01/10] sched/fair: clean up asym packing Vincent Guittot
2019-09-27 23:57 ` Rik van Riel
2019-09-19 7:33 ` [PATCH v3 02/10] sched/fair: rename sum_nr_running to sum_h_nr_running Vincent Guittot
2019-09-27 23:59 ` Rik van Riel
2019-10-01 17:11 ` Valentin Schneider
2019-09-19 7:33 ` [PATCH v3 03/10] sched/fair: remove meaningless imbalance calculation Vincent Guittot
2019-09-28 0:05 ` Rik van Riel
2019-10-01 17:12 ` Valentin Schneider
2019-10-02 6:28 ` Vincent Guittot
2019-09-19 7:33 ` [PATCH v3 04/10] sched/fair: rework load_balance Vincent Guittot
2019-09-30 1:12 ` Rik van Riel
2019-09-30 7:44 ` Vincent Guittot
2019-09-30 16:24 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2019-10-01 8:14 ` Vincent Guittot
2019-10-01 16:52 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2019-10-02 6:44 ` Vincent Guittot
2019-10-02 9:21 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2019-10-08 13:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-10-02 8:23 ` Vincent Guittot
2019-10-02 9:24 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2019-10-01 8:15 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2019-10-01 9:14 ` Vincent Guittot
2019-10-01 16:57 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2019-10-01 17:47 ` Valentin Schneider
2019-10-02 8:30 ` Vincent Guittot
2019-10-02 10:47 ` Valentin Schneider
2019-10-08 14:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-10-08 14:34 ` Valentin Schneider
2019-10-08 15:30 ` Vincent Guittot
2019-10-08 15:48 ` Valentin Schneider
2019-10-08 17:39 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2019-10-08 18:45 ` Vincent Guittot
2019-10-08 16:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-10-08 16:39 ` Valentin Schneider
2019-10-08 17:36 ` Valentin Schneider
2019-10-08 17:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-10-08 18:47 ` Vincent Guittot
2019-10-16 7:21 ` Parth Shah
2019-10-16 11:56 ` Vincent Guittot
2019-10-18 5:34 ` Parth Shah
2019-09-19 7:33 ` [PATCH v3 05/10] sched/fair: use rq->nr_running when balancing load Vincent Guittot
2019-09-19 7:33 ` [PATCH v3 06/10] sched/fair: use load instead of runnable load in load_balance Vincent Guittot
2019-09-19 7:33 ` [PATCH v3 07/10] sched/fair: evenly spread tasks when not overloaded Vincent Guittot
2019-09-19 7:33 ` [PATCH v3 08/10] sched/fair: use utilization to select misfit task Vincent Guittot
2019-10-01 17:12 ` Valentin Schneider
2019-09-19 7:33 ` [PATCH v3 09/10] sched/fair: use load instead of runnable load in wakeup path Vincent Guittot
2019-10-07 15:14 ` Rik van Riel
2019-10-07 15:27 ` Vincent Guittot
2019-10-07 18:06 ` Rik van Riel
2019-09-19 7:33 ` [PATCH v3 10/10] sched/fair: optimize find_idlest_group Vincent Guittot
2019-10-08 14:32 ` [PATCH v3 0/8] sched/fair: rework the CFS load balance Phil Auld
2019-10-08 15:53 ` Vincent Guittot
2019-10-09 19:33 ` Phil Auld
2019-10-10 8:20 ` Vincent Guittot
2019-10-16 7:21 ` Parth Shah
2019-10-16 11:51 ` Vincent Guittot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191008173910.GB22902@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=Morten.Rasmussen@arm.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=hdanton@sina.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pauld@redhat.com \
--cc=quentin.perret@arm.com \
--cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.