From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: Denis Efremov <efremov@linux.com>
Cc: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>,
"devel@driverdev.osuosl.org" <devel@driverdev.osuosl.org>,
Jes Sorensen <jes.sorensen@gmail.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
Bastien Nocera <hadess@hadess.net>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: rtl8723bs: hal: Fix memcpy calls
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2019 17:38:55 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191009143855.GE13286@kadam> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191001185730.GM29696@kadam>
On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 09:58:55PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 06:13:21PM +0300, Denis Efremov wrote:
> > Just found an official documentation to this issue:
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.9/porting_to.html
> > "Null pointer checks may be optimized away more aggressively
> > ...
> > The pointers passed to memmove (and similar functions in <string.h>) must be non-null
> > even when nbytes==0, so GCC can use that information to remove the check after the
> > memmove call. Calling copy(p, NULL, 0) can therefore deference a null pointer and crash."
> >
>
> Correct. In glibc those functions are annotated as non-NULL.
>
> extern void *memcpy (void *__restrict __dest, const void *__restrict __src,
> size_t __n) __THROW __nonnull ((1, 2));
I was wrong on this. It's built into GCC so it doesn't matter how it's
annotated.
>
> We aren't going to do that in the kernel. A second difference is that
> in the kernel we use -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks so it doesn't
> delete the NULL checks.
But it's true that the kernel has -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks so I
don't think this is worth patching.
regards,
dan carpenter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-09 14:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-30 11:01 [PATCH] staging: rtl8723bs: hal: Fix memcpy calls Denis Efremov
2019-09-30 13:18 ` David Laight
2019-09-30 14:25 ` Denis Efremov
2019-10-01 13:56 ` Dan Carpenter
2019-10-01 14:36 ` David Laight
2019-10-01 15:13 ` Denis Efremov
2019-10-01 16:00 ` David Laight
2019-10-01 18:58 ` Dan Carpenter
2019-10-01 20:15 ` Denis Efremov
2019-10-09 14:38 ` Dan Carpenter [this message]
2019-09-30 15:40 ` Denis Efremov
2019-10-09 9:35 ` Hans de Goede
2019-10-09 10:43 ` Denis Efremov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191009143855.GE13286@kadam \
--to=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=David.Laight@ACULAB.COM \
--cc=Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=efremov@linux.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hadess@hadess.net \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=jes.sorensen@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.