From: Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie@intel.com>
To: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>
Cc: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>,
Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>,
Zhihong Wang <zhihong.wang@intel.com>, dev <dev@dpdk.org>,
Dilshod Urazov <Dilshod.Urazov@oktetlabs.ru>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] net/virtio: reject unsupported Rx multi queue modes
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2019 17:10:20 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191010091020.GA5729@___> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e8aa95fe-a422-cf5a-c505-f6c240068e9a@solarflare.com>
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 11:27:53AM +0300, Andrew Rybchenko wrote:
> On 10/10/19 11:23 AM, David Marchand wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 10:14 AM Andrew Rybchenko
> > <arybchenko@solarflare.com> wrote:
> > > On 10/10/19 10:42 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > > 09/10/2019 13:24, Andrew Rybchenko:
> > > > > On 10/9/19 1:41 PM, Tiwei Bie wrote:
> > > > > > My understanding is that, setting mq_mode to ETH_MQ_RX_NONE means
> > > > > > no method is enforced on how to route packets to MQs.
> > > > > I'm not sure. It is definitely a place to be improved in
> > > > > ethdev documentation. Thomas, Ferruh, what do you think?
> > > > > Is it really a definition of ETH_MQ_RX_NONE?
> > > > I think it means everything go to queue 0.
> > > I understand it this way as well.
> > >
> > > > The comment says no DCB, RSS or VMDQ.
> > > > It looks like the "NONE" value has been abused for some custom steering.
> > > > We have two options:
> > > > - document NONE as a possible case of custom steering
> > > > - add a new CUSTOM value
> > > I'd prefer to say that ETH_MQ_RX_RSS with rss_hf equal to 0 means
> > > unspecified/unknown steering. If application just want to spread
> > > traffic across many Rx queues, it is natural choice to say that
> > > it want RSS, but do not care about spreading algorithm etc.
> > > It allows driver use recommended defaults if rss_hf is controllable,
> > > or just spread in virtio case.
> > RSS is about maintaining affinity of a "flow" (as in packets sharing
> > the same l3/l4 tuples) to a specific queue.
> > Here, we can have packets from a same flow on any queue depending on
> > what happened on the vhost side.
>
> Interesting. I'd like to know a bit more about it. I didn't know that
> it is so unstable. Could someone who knows the topic well add
> a bit more information about it.
The spec defined automatic steering [1], but it's not very strict
for the device. So it depends on the implementation.
[1] https://github.com/oasis-tcs/virtio-spec/commit/f7020384521e5938cdd1351270b32b143f070d00
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-10 9:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-01 15:44 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] net/virtio: reject deferred start Rx queue setup Andrew Rybchenko
2019-10-01 15:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/3] net/virtio: reject deferred start Tx " Andrew Rybchenko
2019-10-08 5:35 ` Tiwei Bie
2019-10-01 15:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] net/virtio: reject unsupported Rx multi queue modes Andrew Rybchenko
2019-10-08 5:46 ` Tiwei Bie
2019-10-09 8:04 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2019-10-09 8:43 ` Tiwei Bie
2019-10-09 9:00 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2019-10-09 10:41 ` Tiwei Bie
2019-10-09 11:24 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2019-10-10 7:42 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-10-10 8:13 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2019-10-10 8:23 ` David Marchand
2019-10-10 8:27 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2019-10-10 9:10 ` Tiwei Bie [this message]
2019-10-01 16:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] net/virtio: reject deferred start Rx queue setup Kevin Traynor
2019-10-01 16:39 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2019-10-09 12:32 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/4] " Andrew Rybchenko
2019-10-09 12:32 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/4] net/virtio: reject deferred start Tx " Andrew Rybchenko
2019-10-24 9:44 ` Maxime Coquelin
2019-10-09 12:32 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/4] net/virtio: reject unsupported Rx multi queue modes Andrew Rybchenko
2019-10-24 9:44 ` Maxime Coquelin
2019-10-09 12:32 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/4] net/virtio: reject unsupported Tx " Andrew Rybchenko
2019-10-24 9:44 ` Maxime Coquelin
2019-10-24 9:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/4] net/virtio: reject deferred start Rx queue setup Maxime Coquelin
2019-10-24 10:19 ` Maxime Coquelin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191010091020.GA5729@___ \
--to=tiwei.bie@intel.com \
--cc=Dilshod.Urazov@oktetlabs.ru \
--cc=arybchenko@solarflare.com \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=zhihong.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.