From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
xfs <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2] loop: fix no-unmap write-zeroes request behavior
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2019 09:05:45 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191011160545.GD13098@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191010170239.GC13098@magnolia>
From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Currently, if the loop device receives a WRITE_ZEROES request, it asks
the underlying filesystem to punch out the range. This behavior is
correct if unmapping is allowed. However, a NOUNMAP request means that
the caller forbids us from freeing the storage backing the range, so
punching out the range is incorrect behavior.
To satisfy a NOUNMAP | WRITE_ZEROES request, loop should ask the
underlying filesystem to FALLOC_FL_ZERO_RANGE, which is (according to
the fallocate documentation) required to ensure that the entire range is
backed by real storage, which suffices for our purposes.
Fixes: 19372e2769179dd ("loop: implement REQ_OP_WRITE_ZEROES")
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
---
v2: reorganize a little according to hch feedback
---
drivers/block/loop.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/block/loop.c b/drivers/block/loop.c
index f6f77eaa7217..4943d0c5c61c 100644
--- a/drivers/block/loop.c
+++ b/drivers/block/loop.c
@@ -441,6 +441,28 @@ static int lo_discard(struct loop_device *lo, struct request *rq, loff_t pos)
return ret;
}
+static int lo_zeroout(struct loop_device *lo, struct request *rq, loff_t pos)
+{
+ struct file *file = lo->lo_backing_file;
+ int mode = FALLOC_FL_ZERO_RANGE | FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE;
+ int ret;
+
+ /*
+ * Ask the fs to zero out the blocks, which is supposed to result in
+ * space being allocated to the file.
+ */
+ if (!file->f_op->fallocate) {
+ ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ ret = file->f_op->fallocate(file, mode, pos, blk_rq_bytes(rq));
+ if (unlikely(ret && ret != -EINVAL && ret != -EOPNOTSUPP))
+ ret = -EIO;
+ out:
+ return ret;
+}
+
static int lo_req_flush(struct loop_device *lo, struct request *rq)
{
struct file *file = lo->lo_backing_file;
@@ -596,8 +618,15 @@ static int do_req_filebacked(struct loop_device *lo, struct request *rq)
switch (req_op(rq)) {
case REQ_OP_FLUSH:
return lo_req_flush(lo, rq);
- case REQ_OP_DISCARD:
case REQ_OP_WRITE_ZEROES:
+ /*
+ * If the caller doesn't want deallocation, call zeroout to
+ * write zeroes the range. Otherwise, punch them out.
+ */
+ if (rq->cmd_flags & REQ_NOUNMAP)
+ return lo_zeroout(lo, rq, pos);
+ /* fall through */
+ case REQ_OP_DISCARD:
return lo_discard(lo, rq, pos);
case REQ_OP_WRITE:
if (lo->transfer)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-11 16:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-10 17:02 [PATCH] loop: fix no-unmap write-zeroes request behavior Darrick J. Wong
2019-10-11 7:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-10-11 16:05 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2019-10-14 7:28 ` [PATCH v2] " Christoph Hellwig
2019-10-14 15:50 ` [PATCH v3] " Darrick J. Wong
2019-10-14 16:39 ` Eric Sandeen
2019-10-14 17:00 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-10-15 7:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191011160545.GD13098@magnolia \
--to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.