From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
To: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, jmattson@google.com
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 1/2] Use a status enum for reporting pass/fail
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 09:26:57 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191014162657.GB22962@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191012074454.208377-1-morbo@google.com>
On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 12:44:53AM -0700, Bill Wendling wrote:
> Some values passed into "report" as "pass/fail" are larger than the
> size of the parameter. Instead use a status enum so that the size of the
> argument no longer matters.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>
The threading of these mails has me all kinds of confused. What is the
relationship between all these patches? Did you perhaps intend to send
some of these as v2?
[kvm-unit-tests PATCH 1/2] Use a status enum for reporting pass/fail
[kvm-unit-tests PATCH 2/2] Use a status enum for reporting pass/fail
[kvm-unit-tests PATCH 1/1] x86: use pointer for end of exception table
[kvm-unit-tests PATCH 2/2] x86: use pointer for end of exception table
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-14 16:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-12 7:44 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 1/2] Use a status enum for reporting pass/fail Bill Wendling
2019-10-12 7:44 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 2/2] x86: use pointer for end of exception table Bill Wendling
2019-10-13 7:18 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 1/1] " Bill Wendling
2019-10-15 7:41 ` Thomas Huth
2019-10-15 8:06 ` Bill Wendling
2019-10-12 8:20 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 2/2] Use a status enum for reporting pass/fail Bill Wendling
2019-10-14 16:26 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2019-10-14 18:23 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 1/2] " Bill Wendling
2019-10-15 20:46 ` [kvm-unit-tests v2 PATCH 0/2] Clang compilation fixes Bill Wendling
2019-10-15 20:46 ` [kvm-unit-tests v2 PATCH 1/2] lib: use a status enum for reporting pass/fail Bill Wendling
2019-10-15 20:46 ` [kvm-unit-tests v2 PATCH 2/2] x86: don't compare two global objects' addrs for inequality Bill Wendling
2019-10-16 5:53 ` Thomas Huth
2019-10-21 15:33 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-10-21 15:32 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 1/2] Use a status enum for reporting pass/fail Paolo Bonzini
2019-10-29 18:51 ` Bill Wendling
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191014162657.GB22962@linux.intel.com \
--to=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=morbo@google.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.