From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93E5EFA372A for ; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 14:10:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E68E2168B for ; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 14:10:03 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 5E68E2168B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id CF0398E002F; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 10:10:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id CA0488E0001; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 10:10:02 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id B66B48E002F; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 10:10:02 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0093.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.93]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F08C8E0001 for ; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 10:10:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin06.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay05.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 275CB18043671 for ; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 14:10:02 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 76049831844.06.suit20_42ce894962b X-HE-Tag: suit20_42ce894962b X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 3492 Received: from mx1.suse.de (mx2.suse.de [195.135.220.15]) by imf03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 14:10:01 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3777B979; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 14:09:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 16:09:58 +0200 From: Michal Hocko To: David Hildenbrand Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, Andrea Arcangeli , Andrew Morton , Juergen Gross , Pavel Tatashin , Alexander Duyck , Anthony Yznaga , Vlastimil Babka , Johannes Weiner , Oscar Salvador , Pingfan Liu , Qian Cai , Dan Williams , Mel Gorman , Mike Rapoport , Wei Yang , Alexander Potapenko , Anshuman Khandual , Jason Gunthorpe , Stephen Rothwell , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Matthew Wilcox , Yu Zhao , Minchan Kim , Yang Shi , Ira Weiny , Andrey Ryabinin Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v3 6/9] mm: Allow to offline PageOffline() pages with a reference count of 0 Message-ID: <20191016140958.GE317@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <20190919142228.5483-1-david@redhat.com> <20190919142228.5483-7-david@redhat.com> <20191016114321.GX317@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20191016134519.GC317@dhcp22.suse.cz> <2aef8477-7d12-63a8-e273-9eae8712d5c2@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2aef8477-7d12-63a8-e273-9eae8712d5c2@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Wed 16-10-19 15:55:00, David Hildenbrand wrote: > On 16.10.19 15:45, Michal Hocko wrote: [...] > > There is state stored in the struct page. In other words this shouldn't > > be really different from HWPoison pages. I cannot find the code that is > > doing that and maybe we don't handle that. But we cannot simply online > > hwpoisoned page. Offlining the range will not make a broken memory OK > > all of the sudden. And your usecase sounds similar to me. > > Sorry to say, but whenever we online memory the memmap is overwritten, > because there is no way you could tell it contains garbage or not. You have > to assume it is garbage. (my recent patch even poisons the memmap when > offlining, which helped to find a lot of these "garbage memmap" BUGs) > > online_pages() > ... > move_pfn_range_to_zone(zone, pfn, nr_pages, NULL); > ... > memmap_init_zone() > -> memmap initialized > > So yes, offlining memory with HWPoison and re-onlining it effectively drops > HWPoison markers. On the next access, you will trigger a new HWPoison. Right you are! I need to sit on this much more and think about it with a clean head. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs