All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl>
Cc: Dariusz Marcinkiewicz <darekm@google.com>,
	Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv8 2/2] drm: tda998x: set the connector info
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 17:22:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191016162232.GY25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191016133916.21475-3-hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl>

On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 03:39:16PM +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> From: Dariusz Marcinkiewicz <darekm@google.com>
> 
> Fill in the cec_connector_info when calling cec_notifier_conn_register().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dariusz Marcinkiewicz <darekm@google.com>
> Tested-by: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl>
> Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i2c/tda998x_drv.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++-------------
>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i2c/tda998x_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i2c/tda998x_drv.c
> index 8262b44b776e..b0620842fa3a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i2c/tda998x_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i2c/tda998x_drv.c
> @@ -1337,6 +1337,8 @@ static int tda998x_connector_init(struct tda998x_priv *priv,
>  				  struct drm_device *drm)
>  {
>  	struct drm_connector *connector = &priv->connector;
> +	struct cec_connector_info conn_info;
> +	struct cec_notifier *notifier;
>  	int ret;
>  
>  	connector->interlace_allowed = 1;
> @@ -1353,6 +1355,17 @@ static int tda998x_connector_init(struct tda998x_priv *priv,
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
>  
> +	cec_fill_conn_info_from_drm(&conn_info, connector);
> +
> +	notifier = cec_notifier_conn_register(priv->cec_glue.parent,
> +					      NULL, &conn_info);
> +	if (!notifier)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&priv->cec_notify_mutex);
> +	priv->cec_notify = notifier;
> +	mutex_unlock(&priv->cec_notify_mutex);

As per my previous comments, this is a single-copy atomic operation.
Either priv->cec_notify is set or it isn't; there is no intermediate
value.  It can't be set to a value until cec_notifier_conn_register()
has completed.  So the lock doesn't help.

> +
>  	drm_connector_attach_encoder(&priv->connector,
>  				     priv->bridge.encoder);
>  
> @@ -1372,6 +1385,11 @@ static void tda998x_bridge_detach(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
>  {
>  	struct tda998x_priv *priv = bridge_to_tda998x_priv(bridge);
>  
> +	mutex_lock(&priv->cec_notify_mutex);
> +	cec_notifier_conn_unregister(priv->cec_notify);
> +	priv->cec_notify = NULL;
> +	mutex_unlock(&priv->cec_notify_mutex);

This is the only case where the lock makes sense - to ensure that any
of the cec_notifier_set_phys_addr*() functions aren't called
concurrently with it.  However, there's no locking around the instance
in tda998x_connector_get_modes(), so have you ensured that that
function can't be called concurrently?

Thanks.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl>
Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
	Dariusz Marcinkiewicz <darekm@google.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv8 2/2] drm: tda998x: set the connector info
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 17:22:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191016162232.GY25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191016133916.21475-3-hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl>

On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 03:39:16PM +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> From: Dariusz Marcinkiewicz <darekm@google.com>
> 
> Fill in the cec_connector_info when calling cec_notifier_conn_register().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dariusz Marcinkiewicz <darekm@google.com>
> Tested-by: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl>
> Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i2c/tda998x_drv.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++-------------
>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i2c/tda998x_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i2c/tda998x_drv.c
> index 8262b44b776e..b0620842fa3a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i2c/tda998x_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i2c/tda998x_drv.c
> @@ -1337,6 +1337,8 @@ static int tda998x_connector_init(struct tda998x_priv *priv,
>  				  struct drm_device *drm)
>  {
>  	struct drm_connector *connector = &priv->connector;
> +	struct cec_connector_info conn_info;
> +	struct cec_notifier *notifier;
>  	int ret;
>  
>  	connector->interlace_allowed = 1;
> @@ -1353,6 +1355,17 @@ static int tda998x_connector_init(struct tda998x_priv *priv,
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
>  
> +	cec_fill_conn_info_from_drm(&conn_info, connector);
> +
> +	notifier = cec_notifier_conn_register(priv->cec_glue.parent,
> +					      NULL, &conn_info);
> +	if (!notifier)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&priv->cec_notify_mutex);
> +	priv->cec_notify = notifier;
> +	mutex_unlock(&priv->cec_notify_mutex);

As per my previous comments, this is a single-copy atomic operation.
Either priv->cec_notify is set or it isn't; there is no intermediate
value.  It can't be set to a value until cec_notifier_conn_register()
has completed.  So the lock doesn't help.

> +
>  	drm_connector_attach_encoder(&priv->connector,
>  				     priv->bridge.encoder);
>  
> @@ -1372,6 +1385,11 @@ static void tda998x_bridge_detach(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
>  {
>  	struct tda998x_priv *priv = bridge_to_tda998x_priv(bridge);
>  
> +	mutex_lock(&priv->cec_notify_mutex);
> +	cec_notifier_conn_unregister(priv->cec_notify);
> +	priv->cec_notify = NULL;
> +	mutex_unlock(&priv->cec_notify_mutex);

This is the only case where the lock makes sense - to ensure that any
of the cec_notifier_set_phys_addr*() functions aren't called
concurrently with it.  However, there's no locking around the instance
in tda998x_connector_get_modes(), so have you ensured that that
function can't be called concurrently?

Thanks.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up

  reply	other threads:[~2019-10-16 16:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-16 13:39 [PATCHv8 0/2] drm: tda998x: use cec_notifier_conn_(un)register Hans Verkuil
2019-10-16 13:39 ` Hans Verkuil
2019-10-16 13:39 ` [PATCHv8 1/2] " Hans Verkuil
2019-10-16 13:39   ` Hans Verkuil
2019-10-16 16:14   ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-10-16 16:14     ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-10-17  7:03     ` Hans Verkuil
2019-10-17  7:03       ` Hans Verkuil
2019-10-17  7:29       ` Hans Verkuil
2019-10-17  7:29         ` Hans Verkuil
2019-10-17  9:27     ` Dariusz Marcinkiewicz
2019-10-17  9:27       ` Dariusz Marcinkiewicz
2019-10-16 13:39 ` [PATCHv8 2/2] drm: tda998x: set the connector info Hans Verkuil
2019-10-16 13:39   ` Hans Verkuil
2019-10-16 16:22   ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin [this message]
2019-10-16 16:22     ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-10-17  9:26     ` Dariusz Marcinkiewicz
2019-10-17  9:26       ` Dariusz Marcinkiewicz
2019-10-17  9:44       ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-10-17  9:44         ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191016162232.GY25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk \
    --to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=darekm@google.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl \
    --cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.