Re: [PATCH][RESEND 0/6] YOCTO #12937 - Consistent naming scheme for deployed artifacts

[Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1754 bytes --]

On Sun, Oct 13, 2019 at 02:44:30PM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Sat, 2019-10-12 at 13:03 +0000, Martin Jansa wrote:
> > The following changes since commit
> > 59938780e7e776d87146002ea939b185f8704408:
> > 
> >   build-appliance-image: Update to master head revision (2019-10-09
> > 22:28:44 +0100)
> > 
> > are available in the Git repository at:
> > 
> >   git://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib
> > jansa/artifacts
> >   
> > http://cgit.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib/log/?h=jansa/artifacts
> > 
> > Martin Jansa (6):
> >   image-artifact-names: introduce new bbclass and move some variables
> >     into it
> >   bitbake.conf, kernel*.bbclass: include IMAGE_VERSION_SUFFIX only in
> >     the _LINK_NAME variables and change it to hard link
> >   kernel-artifact-names.bbclass: use PR instead of PKGR in
> >     KERNEL_ARTIFACT_NAME
> >   kernel.bbclass: imageType without {}
> >   kernel.bbclass: drop unnecessary package_get_auto_pr for do_install
> >   *-artifact-names: include version only in the artifact links
> 
> I tried this on the autobuilder and it seems to break several things:
> 
> https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/83/builds/423
> 
> Looks like do_bootimg fails, as well as the testimage oeqa code being
> unable to find the testdata json files.

I've successfully built this with nodistro and qemux86-64 before sending
the pull request, now I've built core-image-sato-sdk-ptest with poky and
genericx86-64 as well, so I'm still trying to figure out what
autobuilder does differently to break it like this.

> There could well be further issues beyond that but its hard to tell.

-- 
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 201 bytes --]