From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Cc: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>,
syzbot <syzbot+492a4acccd8fc75ddfd0@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
christian@brauner.io, deepa.kernel@gmail.com,
ebiederm@xmission.com, guro@fb.com,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: KCSAN: data-race in exit_signals / prepare_signal
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 15:47:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191021134659.GA1339@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANpmjNMfCK99DoUuR2qRBTLLhrGsYVcpKdtXW7S559tNJ-MO7A@mail.gmail.com>
On 10/21, Marco Elver wrote:
>
> On Mon, 21 Oct 2019 at 14:00, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > I think this is WONTFIX.
>
> If taking the spinlock is unnecessary (which AFAIK it probably is) and
> there are no other writers to this flag, you will still need a
> WRITE_ONCE(tsk->flags, tsk->flags | PF_EXITING) to avoid the
> data-race.
Or even WRITE_ONCE(tsk->flags, READ_ONCE(tsk->flags) | PF_EXITING) in
theory. But in practice, I do not think compiler can turn
curent->flags |= PF_EXITING;
into something which temporary clears another flag, say, PF_KTHREAD.
> However, if it is possible that there are concurrent writers setting
> other bits in flags,
No, only current taks should change its ->flags.
Oleg.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-21 13:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-21 10:34 KCSAN: data-race in exit_signals / prepare_signal syzbot
2019-10-21 11:19 ` Christian Brauner
2019-10-21 12:00 ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-10-21 12:15 ` Marco Elver
2019-10-21 13:47 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2019-10-21 12:51 ` Christian Brauner
2019-10-21 14:21 ` cgroup_enable_task_cg_lists && PF_EXITING (Was: KCSAN: data-race in exit_signals / prepare_signal) Oleg Nesterov
2019-10-24 17:54 ` Tejun Heo
2019-10-24 19:03 ` [PATCH cgroup/for-5.5] cgroup: remove cgroup_enable_task_cg_lists() optimization Tejun Heo
2019-10-25 12:56 ` Tejun Heo
2019-10-25 13:33 ` Christian Brauner
2019-10-25 14:13 ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-10-25 14:32 ` Christian Brauner
2019-10-25 15:52 ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-10-25 17:05 ` Christian Brauner
2019-10-28 16:48 ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-10-28 17:30 ` Christian Brauner
2019-10-28 17:46 ` Marco Elver
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191021134659.GA1339@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=christian.brauner@ubuntu.com \
--cc=christian@brauner.io \
--cc=deepa.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=guro@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=syzbot+492a4acccd8fc75ddfd0@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.