From: Like Xu <like.xu@linux.intel.com>
To: pbonzini@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: like.xu@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
jmattson@google.com, sean.j.christopherson@intel.com,
wei.w.wang@intel.com, kan.liang@intel.com
Subject: [PATCH v3 3/6] KVM: x86/vPMU: Rename pmu_ops callbacks from msr_idx to rdpmc_idx
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2019 00:06:48 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191021160651.49508-4-like.xu@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191021160651.49508-1-like.xu@linux.intel.com>
The leagcy pmu_ops->msr_idx_to_pmc is only called in kvm_pmu_rdpmc, so
this name is restrictedly limited to rdpmc_idx which could be indexed
exactly to a kvm_pmc. Let's restrict its semantic by renaming the
existing msr_idx_to_pmc to rdpmc_idx_to_pmc, and is_valid_msr_idx to
is_valid_rdpmc_idx (likewise for kvm_pmu_is_valid_msr_idx).
Suggested-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Like Xu <like.xu@linux.intel.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c | 6 +++---
arch/x86/kvm/pmu.h | 8 ++++----
arch/x86/kvm/pmu_amd.c | 9 +++++----
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c | 10 +++++-----
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 2 +-
5 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c
index 46875bbd0419..de362ba0df01 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c
@@ -271,9 +271,9 @@ void kvm_pmu_handle_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
}
/* check if idx is a valid index to access PMU */
-int kvm_pmu_is_valid_msr_idx(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned idx)
+int kvm_pmu_is_valid_rdpmc_idx(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int idx)
{
- return kvm_x86_ops->pmu_ops->is_valid_msr_idx(vcpu, idx);
+ return kvm_x86_ops->pmu_ops->is_valid_rdpmc_idx(vcpu, idx);
}
bool is_vmware_backdoor_pmc(u32 pmc_idx)
@@ -323,7 +323,7 @@ int kvm_pmu_rdpmc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned idx, u64 *data)
if (is_vmware_backdoor_pmc(idx))
return kvm_pmu_rdpmc_vmware(vcpu, idx, data);
- pmc = kvm_x86_ops->pmu_ops->msr_idx_to_pmc(vcpu, idx, &mask);
+ pmc = kvm_x86_ops->pmu_ops->rdpmc_idx_to_pmc(vcpu, idx, &mask);
if (!pmc)
return 1;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.h b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.h
index 58265f761c3b..c3faa70d9886 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.h
@@ -25,9 +25,9 @@ struct kvm_pmu_ops {
unsigned (*find_fixed_event)(int idx);
bool (*pmc_is_enabled)(struct kvm_pmc *pmc);
struct kvm_pmc *(*pmc_idx_to_pmc)(struct kvm_pmu *pmu, int pmc_idx);
- struct kvm_pmc *(*msr_idx_to_pmc)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned idx,
- u64 *mask);
- int (*is_valid_msr_idx)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned idx);
+ struct kvm_pmc *(*rdpmc_idx_to_pmc)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+ unsigned int idx, u64 *mask);
+ int (*is_valid_rdpmc_idx)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int idx);
bool (*is_valid_msr)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr);
int (*get_msr)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr, u64 *data);
int (*set_msr)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info);
@@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ void reprogram_counter(struct kvm_pmu *pmu, int pmc_idx);
void kvm_pmu_deliver_pmi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
void kvm_pmu_handle_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
int kvm_pmu_rdpmc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned pmc, u64 *data);
-int kvm_pmu_is_valid_msr_idx(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned idx);
+int kvm_pmu_is_valid_rdpmc_idx(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int idx);
bool kvm_pmu_is_valid_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr);
int kvm_pmu_get_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr, u64 *data);
int kvm_pmu_set_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu_amd.c b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu_amd.c
index c8388389a3b0..759b090f8140 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu_amd.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu_amd.c
@@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ static struct kvm_pmc *amd_pmc_idx_to_pmc(struct kvm_pmu *pmu, int pmc_idx)
}
/* returns 0 if idx's corresponding MSR exists; otherwise returns 1. */
-static int amd_is_valid_msr_idx(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned idx)
+static int amd_is_valid_rdpmc_idx(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int idx)
{
struct kvm_pmu *pmu = vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu);
@@ -184,7 +184,8 @@ static int amd_is_valid_msr_idx(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned idx)
}
/* idx is the ECX register of RDPMC instruction */
-static struct kvm_pmc *amd_msr_idx_to_pmc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned idx, u64 *mask)
+static struct kvm_pmc *amd_rdpmc_idx_to_pmc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+ unsigned int idx, u64 *mask)
{
struct kvm_pmu *pmu = vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu);
struct kvm_pmc *counters;
@@ -306,8 +307,8 @@ struct kvm_pmu_ops amd_pmu_ops = {
.find_fixed_event = amd_find_fixed_event,
.pmc_is_enabled = amd_pmc_is_enabled,
.pmc_idx_to_pmc = amd_pmc_idx_to_pmc,
- .msr_idx_to_pmc = amd_msr_idx_to_pmc,
- .is_valid_msr_idx = amd_is_valid_msr_idx,
+ .rdpmc_idx_to_pmc = amd_rdpmc_idx_to_pmc,
+ .is_valid_rdpmc_idx = amd_is_valid_rdpmc_idx,
.is_valid_msr = amd_is_valid_msr,
.get_msr = amd_pmu_get_msr,
.set_msr = amd_pmu_set_msr,
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
index 3e9c059099e9..8b999dae15f2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
@@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ static struct kvm_pmc *intel_pmc_idx_to_pmc(struct kvm_pmu *pmu, int pmc_idx)
}
/* returns 0 if idx's corresponding MSR exists; otherwise returns 1. */
-static int intel_is_valid_msr_idx(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned idx)
+static int intel_is_valid_rdpmc_idx(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int idx)
{
struct kvm_pmu *pmu = vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu);
bool fixed = idx & (1u << 30);
@@ -122,8 +122,8 @@ static int intel_is_valid_msr_idx(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned idx)
(fixed && idx >= pmu->nr_arch_fixed_counters);
}
-static struct kvm_pmc *intel_msr_idx_to_pmc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
- unsigned idx, u64 *mask)
+static struct kvm_pmc *intel_rdpmc_idx_to_pmc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+ unsigned int idx, u64 *mask)
{
struct kvm_pmu *pmu = vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu);
bool fixed = idx & (1u << 30);
@@ -366,8 +366,8 @@ struct kvm_pmu_ops intel_pmu_ops = {
.find_fixed_event = intel_find_fixed_event,
.pmc_is_enabled = intel_pmc_is_enabled,
.pmc_idx_to_pmc = intel_pmc_idx_to_pmc,
- .msr_idx_to_pmc = intel_msr_idx_to_pmc,
- .is_valid_msr_idx = intel_is_valid_msr_idx,
+ .rdpmc_idx_to_pmc = intel_rdpmc_idx_to_pmc,
+ .is_valid_rdpmc_idx = intel_is_valid_rdpmc_idx,
.is_valid_msr = intel_is_valid_msr,
.get_msr = intel_pmu_get_msr,
.set_msr = intel_pmu_set_msr,
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 661e2bf38526..72ce691fd45d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -6111,7 +6111,7 @@ static void emulator_set_smbase(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, u64 smbase)
static int emulator_check_pmc(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,
u32 pmc)
{
- return kvm_pmu_is_valid_msr_idx(emul_to_vcpu(ctxt), pmc);
+ return kvm_pmu_is_valid_rdpmc_idx(emul_to_vcpu(ctxt), pmc);
}
static int emulator_read_pmc(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,
--
2.21.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-22 8:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-21 16:06 [PATCH v3 0/6] KVM: x86/vPMU: Efficiency optimization by reusing last created perf_event Like Xu
2019-10-21 16:06 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] perf/core: Provide a kernel-internal interface to recalibrate event period Like Xu
2019-10-21 16:06 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] perf/core: Provide a kernel-internal interface to pause perf_event Like Xu
2019-10-21 16:06 ` Like Xu [this message]
2019-10-23 17:55 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] KVM: x86/vPMU: Rename pmu_ops callbacks from msr_idx to rdpmc_idx Jim Mattson
2019-10-21 16:06 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] KVM: x86/vPMU: Introduce a new kvm_pmu_ops->msr_idx_to_pmc callback Like Xu
2019-10-26 5:28 ` [RFC PATCH] KVM: x86/vPMU: intel_msr_idx_to_pmc() can be static kbuild test robot
2019-10-26 5:28 ` kbuild test robot
2019-10-26 5:28 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] KVM: x86/vPMU: Introduce a new kvm_pmu_ops->msr_idx_to_pmc callback kbuild test robot
2019-10-26 5:28 ` kbuild test robot
2019-10-21 16:06 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] KVM: x86/vPMU: Reuse perf_event to avoid unnecessary pmc_reprogram_counter Like Xu
2019-10-21 16:06 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] KVM: x86/vPMU: Add lazy mechanism to release perf_event per vPMC Like Xu
2019-10-22 10:47 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-10-22 12:00 ` Like Xu
2019-10-22 14:09 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191021160651.49508-4-like.xu@linux.intel.com \
--to=like.xu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=like.xu@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
--cc=wei.w.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.