All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alan Kao <alankao@andestech.com>
To: Nick Kossifidis <mick@ics.forth.gr>
Cc: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: Perf-related compilation issues
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2019 07:52:57 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191023235257.GA7587@andestech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1bba622b-1f59-d21b-f396-d9c1a021dc3a@ics.forth.gr>

Hi Nick,

Thanks for pointing out this.

On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 06:15:43PM +0300, Nick Kossifidis wrote:
> Hello all,
> 
> a) Compiling the current fixes branch with a minimal config I get the
> following error:
> 
> riscv64-unknown-linux-gnu-ld: arch/riscv/kernel/perf_callchain.o: in
> function `.L0 ':
> perf_callchain.c:(.text+0x16a): undefined reference to `walk_stackframe'
> make: *** [Makefile:1074: vmlinux] Error 1
> 
> 
> I've removed the static delcaration of walk_stackframe on stackframe.c
> and marked walk_stackframe as extern on perf_callchain.c to fix the
> above issue.
> 
> 
> b) Then If I compile the kernel without CONFIG_RISCV_BASE_PMU I get
> 
> 
> ./arch/riscv/include/asm/perf_event.h:26:2: error: #error "Please
> provide a valid RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS for the PMU."
>  #error "Please provide a valid RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS for the PMU."
> 

The check was meant to warn new PMU developers that they should provide
this parameter for their PMU.

> 
> I noticed that the only place where CONFIG_RISCV_BASE_PMU is checked is
> on perf_event.h and only for this parameter that's not defined anywhere
> else. So for now if one tries to compile the kernel without PMU the
> kernel won't compile + I don't see how unsetting this saves code size as
> the config description says.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Will something like this help?

...
  #ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_BASE_PMU
  #define RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS      2
  #endif

+ #ifndef CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS
+ #define RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS      0
+ #endif

  #ifndef RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS
  #error "Please provide a valid RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS for the PMU."
  #endif
...

> 
> 
> Since I'm not familiar with the perf code how should I approach this ?
> Is the fix on a correct ? How should we handle b ?
> 
> Thanks a lot in advance.
> 
> Regards,
> Nick

> pub  2048R/F2823DEF 2019-05-13 Nick Kossifidis <mick@ics.forth.gr>
> sub  2048R/F84F263E 2019-05-13 [expires: 2020-05-12]



_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

  reply	other threads:[~2019-10-23 23:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-23 15:15 Perf-related compilation issues Nick Kossifidis
2019-10-23 23:52 ` Alan Kao [this message]
2019-10-24  2:23 ` Paul Walmsley
2019-10-24  6:01 ` Mao Han
2019-10-24  6:01   ` Mao Han

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191023235257.GA7587@andestech.com \
    --to=alankao@andestech.com \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mick@ics.forth.gr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.