From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E0EECA9EAF for ; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 12:11:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 711CE2166E for ; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 12:11:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ziepe.ca header.i=@ziepe.ca header.b="kzgW/Mfb" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2439616AbfJXMLc (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Oct 2019 08:11:32 -0400 Received: from mail-qk1-f169.google.com ([209.85.222.169]:46567 "EHLO mail-qk1-f169.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2439599AbfJXMLc (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Oct 2019 08:11:32 -0400 Received: by mail-qk1-f169.google.com with SMTP id e66so23134682qkf.13 for ; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 05:11:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ziepe.ca; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=9nJ7GdDboztBKpIMLvkZZETxLlP6ZMhAopB9fsJFIak=; b=kzgW/Mfb6r1fBDNfpe4ebe8ycecnFHpT9WGcJ+7qYudc2GMffh5IbwGmsyywmbk1Bu 7w0LCmpVSKWAjIgBU1QOpLIIWJ+VT5whHTElBX3ypcWYStHh8wu/Ct8Mm1uJtO9EEY5Q wxo5d3Mlnt9HQcyJL0zLGieJ/Fa/n01CloSgAbeCeE7u0WoLMK9Y93LaCr7csVWZ3+tL kZ65o/Rm9XK1wMAYtQcW4PuanGKqycrMcm6MBs1Cb1kNec/s6jqfrLTKBL3/LKTFIS3l O7Sa5rjFwtuxE3ww1OLV/FmtPl/ui6BXGgOXnuT/f8ojOP+2aIg7MEeBA5H2AkSkxN85 y+AA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=9nJ7GdDboztBKpIMLvkZZETxLlP6ZMhAopB9fsJFIak=; b=hoj0RC0L8jybqlIu2YeuS+E6soblRYgJi01wzQrworYOL+jzVJUgfSr/374gJcqQaK 1wZcGXSR9fz2+5h/NyeyKxReXLbuMUg3JjbF0jN6lW9sFyhAWeR5EAdOP2fKsKR7Tdt7 xpR8/DjLshTMkscTEj9pZu3h10twuAKiKxjqRbpzs3EB4oknSPlmnZzvQIITOucV7y5p yFLXcR2nvC55l7fcyk2PTiYuh32wUcMZHKWgR97JVvaMvKTaA2grnnUkjpiyHh3TiSVJ D0NEJ3YB1/XBr4n/pG0DsM/4h86iPdUT0JeKkU17NwAKzCY5hmoPT+7rqsWCaPqRUYJV zshw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXafbM19AcHtcnpDdSJG4T9vcSKYzZr1w6B8/z40/7AH9bk1q16 K8m8cvrWZunBTS1Z1CPyqQodrEmYYU0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwlOJXTat7vjEMaTvUzIzpmHXbS3HUQzX9D+lIbRkg9YAlL5c7jOIX0B8XC97EO7kaLs90TaQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:b16:: with SMTP id t22mr13747647qkg.235.1571919089548; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 05:11:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ziepe.ca (hlfxns017vw-142-162-113-180.dhcp-dynamic.fibreop.ns.bellaliant.net. [142.162.113.180]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t4sm714259qtq.49.2019.10.24.05.11.28 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Thu, 24 Oct 2019 05:11:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jgg by mlx.ziepe.ca with local (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iNbxg-0003vn-Bt; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 09:11:28 -0300 Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2019 09:11:28 -0300 From: Jason Gunthorpe To: Benjamin Drung Cc: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: srp_daemon and ibacm in wrong man section Message-ID: <20191024121128.GS23952@ziepe.ca> References: <41d360c7e2a6db457f3d139a1b35507bc62ae321.camel@cloud.ionos.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41d360c7e2a6db457f3d139a1b35507bc62ae321.camel@cloud.ionos.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Sender: linux-rdma-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 12:19:23PM +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote: > Hi, > > srp_daemon and ibacm are both installed in /usr/sbin. lintian complains > about command-in-sbin-has-manpage-in-incorrect-section: > > The command in /sbin or /usr/sbin are system administration commands; > their manpages thus belong in section 8, not section 1. Yes, srp_daemon should only be invoked by systemd, so it should be in 8 Jason