From: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
To: speck@linutronix.de
Subject: [MODERATED] Re: [PATCH 3/9] TAA 3
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2019 18:33:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191024163336.GC14115@zn.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191024153015.akowqjkf2wm52scv@treble>
On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 10:30:15AM -0500, speck for Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> This still needs details about when 'tsx=off' does and doesn't work.
>
> The above makes it sound like it's off for all CPUs, when in fact it's
> only off for newer MDS_NO CPUs.
How does that sound (and that is being mentioned somewhere in all the
text but here it is important to have):
off - Disable TSX on the system. (Note that this
option takes effect only on newer CPUs which are
not vulnerable to MDS, i.e., have
MSR_IA32_ARCH_CAPABILITIES.MDS_NO=1 and which get
the new IA32_TSX_CTRL MSR through a microcode
update. This new MSR allows for the reliable
deactivation of the TSX functionality.)
> It should also perhaps describe the risks associated with tsx=on. While
> there are mitigations for all known issues (i.e., the tsx_async_abort=
> option), TSX has been known to be an accelerator for several previous
> speculation-related CVEs, and so there may be unknown security risks
> associated with leaving it enabled.
You've basically said it nicely already:
"Although there are mitigations for all known security vulnerabilities,
TSX has been known to be an accelerator for several previous
speculation-related CVEs, and so there may be unknown security risks
associated with leaving it enabled."
ACK?
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-24 16:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 75+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-24 8:20 [MODERATED] [PATCH 0/9] TAA 0 Borislav Petkov
2019-10-23 8:45 ` [MODERATED] [PATCH 1/9] TAA 1 Pawan Gupta
2019-10-24 15:22 ` [MODERATED] " Josh Poimboeuf
2019-10-24 16:23 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-10-24 16:42 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-10-23 8:52 ` [MODERATED] [PATCH 2/9] TAA 2 Pawan Gupta
2019-10-23 9:01 ` [MODERATED] [PATCH 3/9] TAA 3 Pawan Gupta
2019-10-24 15:30 ` [MODERATED] " Josh Poimboeuf
2019-10-24 16:33 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2019-10-24 16:43 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-10-24 17:39 ` Andrew Cooper
2019-10-24 19:45 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-10-24 19:59 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-10-24 20:05 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-10-24 20:14 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-10-24 20:36 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-10-24 20:43 ` Andrew Cooper
2019-10-24 20:55 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-10-24 20:44 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-10-24 20:07 ` Andrew Cooper
2019-10-24 20:17 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-10-24 22:38 ` Andrew Cooper
2019-10-25 6:03 ` Pawan Gupta
2019-10-25 7:25 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-10-25 7:17 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-10-25 9:08 ` Andrew Cooper
2019-10-27 7:48 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-10-27 7:49 ` [MODERATED] [AUTOREPLY] [MODERATED] [AUTOREPLY] Automatic reply: " James, Hengameh M
2019-10-24 19:47 ` [MODERATED] " Pawan Gupta
2019-10-30 13:28 ` Greg KH
2019-10-30 14:48 ` [MODERATED] Re: ***UNCHECKED*** " Michal Hocko
2019-10-30 17:24 ` [MODERATED] " Pawan Gupta
2019-10-30 19:27 ` Greg KH
2019-10-30 19:44 ` [MODERATED] Re: ***UNCHECKED*** " Michal Hocko
2019-11-01 9:35 ` Greg KH
2019-11-01 13:15 ` [MODERATED] " Borislav Petkov
2019-11-01 14:33 ` Greg KH
2019-11-01 18:42 ` [MODERATED] Re: ***UNCHECKED*** " Michal Hocko
2019-10-23 9:30 ` [MODERATED] [PATCH 4/9] TAA 4 Pawan Gupta
2019-10-24 15:32 ` [MODERATED] " Josh Poimboeuf
2019-10-24 16:43 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-10-24 17:15 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-10-24 17:23 ` Pawan Gupta
2019-10-24 17:27 ` Pawan Gupta
2019-10-24 17:34 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-10-24 18:23 ` Andrew Cooper
2019-10-24 18:56 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-10-24 18:59 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-10-24 19:13 ` Andrew Cooper
2019-10-24 19:49 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-10-24 20:48 ` Andrew Cooper
2019-10-25 9:12 ` Andrew Cooper
2019-10-25 0:49 ` Pawan Gupta
2019-10-25 7:36 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-10-23 10:19 ` [MODERATED] [PATCH 5/9] TAA 5 Pawan Gupta
2019-10-24 18:30 ` [MODERATED] " Greg KH
2019-10-23 10:23 ` [MODERATED] [PATCH 6/9] TAA 6 Pawan Gupta
2019-10-23 10:28 ` [MODERATED] [PATCH 7/9] TAA 7 Pawan Gupta
2019-10-24 15:35 ` [MODERATED] " Josh Poimboeuf
2019-10-24 16:42 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-10-24 18:20 ` Jiri Kosina
2019-10-24 19:53 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-10-24 20:02 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-10-24 20:08 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-10-23 10:32 ` [MODERATED] [PATCH 8/9] TAA 8 Pawan Gupta
2019-10-24 16:03 ` [MODERATED] " Josh Poimboeuf
2019-10-24 17:35 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-10-24 18:11 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-10-24 18:55 ` Pawan Gupta
2019-10-25 8:04 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-10-23 10:35 ` [MODERATED] [PATCH 9/9] TAA 9 Michal Hocko
2019-10-24 16:10 ` [MODERATED] " Josh Poimboeuf
2019-10-24 16:58 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-10-25 10:47 ` [MODERATED] Re: ***UNCHECKED*** " Michal Hocko
2019-10-25 13:05 ` [MODERATED] " Josh Poimboeuf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191024163336.GC14115@zn.tnic \
--to=bp@suse.de \
--cc=speck@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.