From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.linutronix.de (193.142.43.55:993) by crypto-ml.lab.linutronix.de with IMAP4-SSL for ; 24 Oct 2019 16:43:36 -0000 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15] helo=mx1.suse.de) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1iNgD1-0003wa-Ig for speck@linutronix.de; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 18:43:35 +0200 Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 464DCAC35 for ; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 16:43:30 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2019 18:43:29 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov Subject: [MODERATED] Re: [PATCH 4/9] TAA 4 Message-ID: <20191024164329.GE14115@zn.tnic> References: <04f1ef8158e54eca18fc3951d75a00c5d398c429.1571905227.git.bp@suse.de> <20191024153240.26zdyr33r2o632ej@treble> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20191024153240.26zdyr33r2o632ej@treble> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: speck@linutronix.de List-ID: On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 10:32:40AM -0500, speck for Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > As I said before this would be a lot nicer if we could just add NO_TAA > to the cpu_vuln_whitelist. We're waiting for a list of CPUs from Intel here, right? --=20 Regards/Gruss, Boris. SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, GF: Felix Imend=C3=B6rffer, HRB 36809, = AG N=C3=BCrnberg --=20