From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10789CA9EA0 for ; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 19:28:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D596120684 for ; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 19:28:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="OHHgUXxQ"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=armlinux.org.uk header.i=@armlinux.org.uk header.b="KnYWJ5nb" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org D596120684 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=armlinux.org.uk Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=IgpQxQtbV+8u2AC9NQ3QG7dzwFbIHn2pDGfW9AZK4mQ=; b=OHHgUXxQZ3cCjY tvtzuhG3kTn85QnHi5AKaOfZz76wcWl73ay7fX4XMpeCT8XllC12/+XP5JR6t2knIs1kE60Lu761Q lH5lS5KOaCs7LZnVssRKfQlN/bvjsJZJMDg4VsGwFKllONWg/6MeE7zY2PHtlbIzIJXpj4Yr2HXId RbTCFMzh2eF1cGEuoITGNPO5JGVq+L2M7L5DDwvZOXNegAqKR1mib9vQ6AQ3QxmEPw+V2MiNbTWXW FxwZ0+SxjQ2x2ru9qxsK2j8uYMoPOHvd9cA4PtqrOC4y5l3POs8ilhAQSmmco14AjhEDoauJSE5f8 7775eo07G59CVw685sNA==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1iO5GY-0002yP-AM; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 19:28:54 +0000 Received: from pandora.armlinux.org.uk ([2001:4d48:ad52:3201:214:fdff:fe10:1be6]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1iO5GU-0002xp-Ff for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 19:28:52 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=armlinux.org.uk; s=pandora-2019; h=Sender:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=LH8KzzfbG4w6U8dPlUcYNQGbWhpitBUuBGmvDlCNbnE=; b=KnYWJ5nbxjQDdWqxk1wFn0qpH crUUgcBsqcpe9f9+jBHC3X9t7XR11Fc01kqZccQtQQDqxlIOZ+5bCIFlFy1OLEtvrEzITUuVbVVEk qPCko4nXxLbE7v+cYcNlNYxjQajVb9FPREMnugAlCA9PyrK6ZauIK3aIAh7x3KZ6KzDkqXNzbOSOe 0IMPFG44IAExA32p1CrWmn2B8Jy4w5fLwL5zhH5e8/UItlpMhL/Vv/kMmTUOn0AmBG+mQXdUJ0ekM lPWT1G70wcMIFdEdmk3zwrFGoSbbez5ZKMhqFr24kPhChu/OvBQJXiST4wkuI0MokGZR5RXZLZtBR +BlDKDPbw==; Received: from shell.armlinux.org.uk ([2001:4d48:ad52:3201:5054:ff:fe00:4ec]:47374) by pandora.armlinux.org.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iO5GO-0004hJ-EU; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 20:28:44 +0100 Received: from linux by shell.armlinux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1iO5GN-0007h5-Bl; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 20:28:43 +0100 Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 20:28:43 +0100 From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin To: Vincenzo Frascino Subject: Re: arm version of generic VDSO? Message-ID: <20191025192843.GF25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk> References: <20191025191735.GE25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191025191735.GE25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20191025_122850_524716_300F8AC2 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 15.71 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: y2038 Mailman List , Arnd Bergmann , Linux ARM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 08:17:36PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote: > On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 01:47:24PM +0100, Vincenzo Frascino wrote: > > Hi Arnd, > > > > On 10/24/19 1:34 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > Hi Vinvenzo, > > > > > > I'm looking through some of the remaining y2038 work, and noticed > > > that arch/arm64 has the new generic vdso implementation, but arch/arm > > > does. > > > > > > > This is correct, arch/arm does not have support for the generic vDSO library. > > > > > Do you patches for using the same code on arch/arm? > > > > > > > The patches were send for review together with the arm64 ones and the rest of > > the architectures supported but they did not get merged yet and I do not know why. > > I think you've forgotten, you didn't read the email from the patch > system, or the "Regression in 5.3-rc1 and later" email thread on the > mailing lists. > > https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/viewpatch.php?id=8868/1 > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/faaa3843-09a6-1a21-3448-072eeed1ea00@googlemail.com/ > > Basically, I couldn't merge for the last merge window without causing > a regression, so it's delayed until the next merge window. Okay, having discussed with Arnd what the current situation is, he points out that he needs an additional patch to solve some further build issues with the generic VDSO patches - caused by the Kconfig changes in your first patch. I'd rather that gets fixed up before I apply the patches, rather than applying a set of patches and a fix on top. Please re-spin with Arnd's Kconfig changes included. Thanks. -- RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel