From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Fw: [Bug 205339] New: epoll can fail to report a socket readable after enabling SO_OOBINLINE
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2019 08:11:07 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191028081107.38b73eb1@hermes.lan> (raw)
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2019 02:55:44 +0000
From: bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org
To: stephen@networkplumber.org
Subject: [Bug 205339] New: epoll can fail to report a socket readable after enabling SO_OOBINLINE
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=205339
Bug ID: 205339
Summary: epoll can fail to report a socket readable after
enabling SO_OOBINLINE
Product: Networking
Version: 2.5
Kernel Version: 5.0
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Tree: Mainline
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: P1
Component: Other
Assignee: stephen@networkplumber.org
Reporter: njs@pobox.com
Regression: No
Created attachment 285671
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=285671&action=edit
reproducer
Consider the following sequence of events:
1. OOB data arrives on a socket.
2. The socket is registered with epoll with EPOLLIN
3. The socket has SO_OOBINLINE toggled from False → True
In this case, the socket is now readable, and select() reports that it's
readable, but epoll does *not* report that it's readable.
This is a pretty minor issue, but it seems like an unambiguous bug so I figured
I'd report it.
Weirdly, this doesn't appear to be a general problem with SO_OOBINLINE+epoll.
For example, this very similar sequence works correctly:
1. The socket is registered with epoll with EPOLLIN
2. OOB data arrives on the socket.
3. The socket has SO_OOBINLINE toggled from False → True
After step 2, epoll reports the socket as not readable, and then after step 3
it reports it as readable, as you'd expect.
In the attached reproducer script, "scenario 4" is the buggy one, and "scenario
3" is the very similar non-buggy one. Output on Ubuntu 19.04, kernel
5.0.0-32-generic, x86-64:
-- Scenario 1: no data --
select() says: sock is NOT readable
epoll says: sock is NOT readable
reality: NOT readable
-- Scenario 2: OOB data arrives --
select() says: sock is NOT readable
epoll says: sock is NOT readable
reality: NOT readable
-- Scenario 3: register -> OOB data arrives -> toggle SO_OOBINLINE=True --
select() says: sock is readable
epoll says: sock is readable
reality: read succeeded
-- Scenario 4: OOB data arrives -> register -> toggle SO_OOBINLINE=True --
select() says: sock is readable
epoll says: sock is NOT readable
reality: read succeeded
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
next reply other threads:[~2019-10-28 15:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-28 15:11 Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2019-10-28 21:22 ` Fw: [Bug 205339] New: epoll can fail to report a socket readable after enabling SO_OOBINLINE Eric Dumazet
2019-10-29 1:59 ` Nathaniel Smith
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191028081107.38b73eb1@hermes.lan \
--to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.