From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] xfs: remove the extsize argument to xfs_eof_alignment
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 08:57:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191029075715.GC18999@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191028160638.GC15222@magnolia>
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 09:06:38AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> Why does it make more sense to do the inode extsize roundup only for
> direct writes and not as an intermediate step of determining the
> speculative preallocation size than what the code does now?
No behavior change in this patch. xfs_buffered_write_iomap_begin
already passes a 0 extsize to xfs_eof_alignment, making the code moved
from xfs_eof_alignment to xfs_iomap_eof_align_last_fsb a no-op for
the buffered write path.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-29 7:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-25 15:03 a few iomap / bmap cleanups Christoph Hellwig
2019-10-25 15:03 ` [PATCH 1/8] xfs: simplify xfs_iomap_eof_align_last_fsb Christoph Hellwig
2019-10-28 15:55 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-10-25 15:03 ` [PATCH 2/8] xfs: mark xfs_eof_alignment static Christoph Hellwig
2019-10-28 15:55 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-10-25 15:03 ` [PATCH 3/8] xfs: remove the extsize argument to xfs_eof_alignment Christoph Hellwig
2019-10-28 16:06 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-10-29 7:57 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2019-10-25 15:03 ` [PATCH 4/8] xfs: don't log the inode in xfs_fs_map_blocks if it wasn't modified Christoph Hellwig
2019-10-28 16:12 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-10-29 7:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-10-30 16:12 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-10-30 17:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-10-25 15:03 ` [PATCH 5/8] xfs: simplify the xfs_iomap_write_direct calling conventions Christoph Hellwig
2019-10-28 16:25 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-10-25 15:03 ` [PATCH 6/8] xfs: refactor xfs_bmapi_allocate Christoph Hellwig
2019-10-28 16:29 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-10-25 15:03 ` [PATCH 7/8] xfs: move extent zeroing to xfs_bmapi_allocate Christoph Hellwig
2019-10-28 16:31 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-10-25 15:03 ` [PATCH 8/8] xfs: cleanup use of the XFS_ALLOC_ flags Christoph Hellwig
2019-10-28 16:32 ` Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191029075715.GC18999@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.