All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>
Cc: linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>,
	Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2] mm: add page preemption
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 09:41:53 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191029084153.GD31513@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191026112808.14268-1-hdanton@sina.com>

On Sat 26-10-19 19:28:08, Hillf Danton wrote:
> 
> The cpu preemption feature makes a task able to preempt other tasks
> of lower priorities for cpu. It has been around for a while.
> 
> This work introduces task prio into page reclaiming in order to add
> the page preemption feature that makes a task able to preempt other
> tasks of lower priorities for page.
> 
> No page will be reclaimed on behalf of tasks of lower priorities
> under pp, a two-edge feature that functions only under memory
> pressure, laying a barrier to pages flowing to lower prio, and the
> nice syscall is what users need to fiddle with it for instance as
> no task will be preempted without prio shades, if they have a couple
> of workloads that are sensitive to jitters in lru pages, and some
> difficulty predicting their working set sizes.
> 
> Currently lru pages are reclaimed under memory pressure without prio
> taken into account; pages can be reclaimed from tasks of lower
> priorities on behalf of higher-prio tasks and vice versa.
> 
> s/and vice versa/only/ is what we need to make pp by definition, but
> it could not make a sense without prio introduced in reclaiming,
> otherwise we can simply skip deactivating the lru pages based on prio
> comprison, and work is done.
> 
> The introduction consists of two parts. On the page side, we have to
> store the page owner task's prio in page, which needs an extra room the
> size of the int type in the page struct.
> 
> That room sounds impossible without inflating the page struct size, and
> it is not solved but walked around by sharing room with the 32-bit numa
> balancing, see 75980e97dacc ("mm: fold page->_last_nid into page->flags
> where possible").
> 
> On the reclaimer side, kswapd's prio is set with the prio of its waker,
> and updated in the same manner as kswapd_order.
> 
> V2 is based on next-20191018.
> 
> Changes since v1
> - page->prio shares room with _last_cpupid as per Matthew Wilcox
> 
> Changes since v0
> - s/page->nice/page->prio/
> - drop the role of kswapd's reclaiming prioirty in prio comparison
> - add pgdat->kswapd_prio
> 
> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>
> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
> Signed-off-by: Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>

As already raised in the review of v1. There is no real life usecase
described in the changelog. I have also expressed concerns about how
such a reclaim would work in the first place (priority inversion,
expensive reclaim etc.). Until that is provided/clarified

Nacked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>

Please do not ignore review feedback in the future.
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-10-29  8:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-26 11:28 [RFC v2] mm: add page preemption Hillf Danton
2019-10-28 12:26 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2019-10-28 13:55 ` Hillf Danton
2019-10-28 15:56 ` Johannes Weiner
2019-10-29  3:04 ` Hillf Danton
2019-10-29  8:41 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2019-10-29 15:27   ` Johannes Weiner
2019-10-29 12:30 ` Hillf Danton
2019-10-29 13:26   ` David Hildenbrand
2019-10-29 13:41     ` Michal Hocko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191029084153.GD31513@dhcp22.suse.cz \
    --to=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=hdanton@sina.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=shakeelb@google.com \
    --cc=vdavydov.dev@gmail.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.