All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
To: acme@kernel.org, jolsa@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
	mingo@redhat.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com
Cc: Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ak@linux.intel.com,
	kan.liang@intel.com, yao.jin@intel.com,
	Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 6/7] perf report: Support --percent-limit for --total-cycles
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2019 14:04:29 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191030060430.23558-7-yao.jin@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191030060430.23558-1-yao.jin@linux.intel.com>

We have already supported the '--total-cycles' option in previous
patch. It's also useful to show entries only above a threshold
percent.

This patch enables '--percent-limit' for not showing entries
under that percent.

For example,

 perf report --total-cycles --stdio --percent-limit 1

 # To display the perf.data header info, please use --header/--header-only options.
 #
 #
 # Total Lost Samples: 0
 #
 # Samples: 2M of event 'cycles'
 # Event count (approx.): 2753248
 #
 # Sampled Cycles%  Sampled Cycles  Avg Cycles%  Avg Cycles                                              [Program Block Range]         Shared Object
 # ...............  ..............  ...........  ..........  .................................................................  ....................
 #
            26.04%            2.8M        0.40%          18                                             [div.c:42 -> div.c:39]                   div
            15.17%            1.2M        0.16%           7                                 [random_r.c:357 -> random_r.c:380]          libc-2.27.so
             5.11%          402.0K        0.04%           2                                             [div.c:27 -> div.c:28]                   div
             4.87%          381.6K        0.04%           2                                     [random.c:288 -> random.c:291]          libc-2.27.so
             4.53%          381.0K        0.04%           2                                             [div.c:40 -> div.c:40]                   div
             3.85%          300.9K        0.02%           1                                             [div.c:22 -> div.c:25]                   div
             3.08%          241.1K        0.02%           1                                           [rand.c:26 -> rand.c:27]          libc-2.27.so
             3.06%          240.0K        0.02%           1                                     [random.c:291 -> random.c:291]          libc-2.27.so
             2.78%          215.7K        0.02%           1                                     [random.c:298 -> random.c:298]          libc-2.27.so
             2.52%          198.3K        0.02%           1                                     [random.c:293 -> random.c:293]          libc-2.27.so
             2.36%          184.8K        0.02%           1                                           [rand.c:28 -> rand.c:28]          libc-2.27.so
             2.33%          180.5K        0.02%           1                                     [random.c:295 -> random.c:295]          libc-2.27.so
             2.28%          176.7K        0.02%           1                                     [random.c:295 -> random.c:295]          libc-2.27.so
             2.20%          168.8K        0.02%           1                                         [rand@plt+0 -> rand@plt+0]                   div
             1.98%          158.2K        0.02%           1                                 [random_r.c:388 -> random_r.c:388]          libc-2.27.so
             1.57%          123.3K        0.02%           1                                             [div.c:42 -> div.c:44]                   div
             1.44%          116.0K        0.42%          19                                 [random_r.c:357 -> random_r.c:394]          libc-2.27.so

It only shows the entries which 'Sampled Cycles%' > 1%.

 v5:
 ---
 No functional change. Only fix the conflict issue because
 previous patches are changed.

 v4:
 ---
 No functional change. Only fix the build issue because
 previous patches are changed.

Signed-off-by: Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
---
 tools/perf/builtin-report.c  |  6 +++---
 tools/perf/ui/stdio/hist.c   |  7 ++++++-
 tools/perf/util/block-info.c | 10 ++++++++++
 tools/perf/util/block-info.h |  2 ++
 4 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-report.c b/tools/perf/builtin-report.c
index 0c53371c286a..516243715190 100644
--- a/tools/perf/builtin-report.c
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-report.c
@@ -485,10 +485,10 @@ static size_t hists__fprintf_nr_sample_events(struct hists *hists, struct report
 	return ret + fprintf(fp, "\n#\n");
 }
 
-static int hists__fprintf_all_blocks(struct block_hist *bh)
+static int hists__fprintf_all_blocks(struct block_hist *bh, float min_percent)
 {
 	symbol_conf.report_individual_block = true;
-	hists__fprintf(&bh->block_hists, true, 0, 0, 0,
+	hists__fprintf(&bh->block_hists, true, 0, 0, min_percent,
 		       stdout, true);
 	hists__delete_entries(&bh->block_hists);
 	return 0;
@@ -519,7 +519,7 @@ static int perf_evlist__tty_browse_hists(struct evlist *evlist,
 
 		if (rep->total_cycles_mode) {
 			block_hist = &rep->block_reports[i++].hist;
-			hists__fprintf_all_blocks(block_hist);
+			hists__fprintf_all_blocks(block_hist, rep->min_percent);
 			continue;
 		}
 
diff --git a/tools/perf/ui/stdio/hist.c b/tools/perf/ui/stdio/hist.c
index 655ef7708cd0..132056c7d5b7 100644
--- a/tools/perf/ui/stdio/hist.c
+++ b/tools/perf/ui/stdio/hist.c
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
 #include "../../util/srcline.h"
 #include "../../util/string2.h"
 #include "../../util/thread.h"
+#include "../../util/block-info.h"
 #include <linux/ctype.h>
 #include <linux/zalloc.h>
 
@@ -856,7 +857,11 @@ size_t hists__fprintf(struct hists *hists, bool show_header, int max_rows,
 		if (h->filtered)
 			continue;
 
-		percent = hist_entry__get_percent_limit(h);
+		if (symbol_conf.report_individual_block)
+			percent = block_info__total_cycles_percent(h);
+		else
+			percent = hist_entry__get_percent_limit(h);
+
 		if (percent < min_pcnt)
 			continue;
 
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/block-info.c b/tools/perf/util/block-info.c
index 1242c3a33509..a7d108fe53c8 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/block-info.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/block-info.c
@@ -444,3 +444,13 @@ struct block_report *block_info__create_report(struct evlist *evlist,
 
 	return block_reports;
 }
+
+float block_info__total_cycles_percent(struct hist_entry *he)
+{
+	struct block_info *bi = he->block_info;
+
+	if (bi->total_cycles)
+		return bi->cycles * 100.0 / bi->total_cycles;
+
+	return 0.0;
+}
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/block-info.h b/tools/perf/util/block-info.h
index b5266588d476..4a0bccbec66e 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/block-info.h
+++ b/tools/perf/util/block-info.h
@@ -69,4 +69,6 @@ int block_info__process_sym(struct hist_entry *he, struct block_hist *bh,
 struct block_report *block_info__create_report(struct evlist *evlist,
 					       u64 total_cycles);
 
+float block_info__total_cycles_percent(struct hist_entry *he);
+
 #endif /* __PERF_BLOCK_H */
-- 
2.17.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-10-30  6:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-30  6:04 [PATCH v5 0/7] perf report: Support sorting all blocks by cycles Jin Yao
2019-10-30  6:04 ` [PATCH v5 1/7] perf diff: Don't use hack to skip column length calculation Jin Yao
2019-10-30  6:04 ` [PATCH v5 2/7] perf util: Cleanup and refactor block info functions Jin Yao
2019-10-30  6:04 ` [PATCH v5 3/7] perf util: Count the total cycles of all samples Jin Yao
2019-10-30  6:04 ` [PATCH v5 4/7] perf util: Support block formats with compare/sort/display Jin Yao
2019-10-30  6:04 ` [PATCH v5 5/7] perf report: Sort by sampled cycles percent per block for stdio Jin Yao
2019-11-04 14:04   ` Jiri Olsa
2019-11-05  3:41     ` Jin, Yao
2019-10-30  6:04 ` Jin Yao [this message]
2019-10-30  6:04 ` [PATCH v5 7/7] perf report: Sort by sampled cycles percent per block for tui Jin Yao
2019-11-01  8:34   ` Jiri Olsa
2019-11-01 13:05     ` Jin, Yao
2019-11-01  8:34   ` Jiri Olsa
2019-11-01 14:07     ` Jin, Yao
2019-11-04 13:53       ` Jiri Olsa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191030060430.23558-7-yao.jin@linux.intel.com \
    --to=yao.jin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=yao.jin@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.