From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>
Cc: Wenbo Zhang <ethercflow@gmail.com>, bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>, Networking <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4] bpf: add new helper fd2path for mapping a file descriptor to a pathname
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2019 16:32:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191030153203.GA2675@pc-63.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEf4BzY5XfX1_Txomnz1G4PCq=E4JSPVD+_BQ7qwn8=WM_imVA@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 11:48:44AM -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 1:59 PM Wenbo Zhang <ethercflow@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > When people want to identify which file system files are being opened,
> > read, and written to, they can use this helper with file descriptor as
> > input to achieve this goal. Other pseudo filesystems are also supported.
> >
> > This requirement is mainly discussed here:
> >
> > https://github.com/iovisor/bcc/issues/237
> >
> > v3->v4:
> > - fix missing fdput()
> > - move fd2path from kernel/bpf/trace.c to kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> > - move fd2path's test code to another patch
> >
> > v2->v3:
> > - remove unnecessary LOCKDOWN_BPF_READ
> > - refactor error handling section for enhanced readability
> > - provide a test case in tools/testing/selftests/bpf
> >
> > v1->v2:
> > - fix backward compatibility
> > - add this helper description
> > - fix signed-off name
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Wenbo Zhang <ethercflow@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 14 +++++++++++-
> > kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 14 +++++++++++-
> > 3 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> > index 4af8b0819a32..124632b2a697 100644
> > --- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> > @@ -2775,6 +2775,17 @@ union bpf_attr {
> > * restricted to raw_tracepoint bpf programs.
> > * Return
> > * 0 on success, or a negative error in case of failure.
> > + *
> > + * int bpf_fd2path(char *path, u32 size, int fd)
>
> from what I can see, we don't have any BPF helper with this naming
> approach(2 -> to, 4 -> for, etc). How about something like
> bpf_get_file_path?
>
> > + * Description
> > + * Get **file** atrribute from the current task by *fd*, then call
> > + * **d_path** to get it's absolute path and copy it as string into
> > + * *path* of *size*. The **path** also support pseudo filesystems
> > + * (whether or not it can be mounted). The *size* must be strictly
> > + * positive. On success, the helper makes sure that the *path* is
> > + * NUL-terminated. On failure, it is filled with zeroes.
> > + * Return
> > + * 0 on success, or a negative error in case of failure.
>
> Mention that we actually return a positive number on success, which is
> a size of the string + 1 for NUL byte (the +1 is not true right now,
> but I think should be).
>
> > */
> > #define __BPF_FUNC_MAPPER(FN) \
> > FN(unspec), \
> > @@ -2888,7 +2899,8 @@ union bpf_attr {
> > FN(sk_storage_delete), \
> > FN(send_signal), \
> > FN(tcp_gen_syncookie), \
> > - FN(skb_output),
> > + FN(skb_output), \
> > + FN(fd2path),
> >
> > /* integer value in 'imm' field of BPF_CALL instruction selects which helper
> > * function eBPF program intends to call
> > diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> > index 571c25d60710..dd7b070df3d6 100644
> > --- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> > +++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> > @@ -683,6 +683,44 @@ static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_send_signal_proto = {
> > .arg1_type = ARG_ANYTHING,
> > };
> >
> > +BPF_CALL_3(bpf_fd2path, char *, dst, u32, size, int, fd)
> > +{
> > + struct fd f;
> > + char *p;
> > + int ret = -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + /* Use fdget_raw instead of fdget to support O_PATH */
> > + f = fdget_raw(fd);
>
> I haven't followed previous discussions, so sorry if this was asked
> before. Can either fdget_raw or d_path sleep? Also, d_path seems to be
> relying on current, which in the interrupt context might not be what
> you really want. Have you considered these problems?
>
> > + if (!f.file)
> > + goto error;
> > +
> > + p = d_path(&f.file->f_path, dst, size);
> > + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(p)) {
> > + ret = PTR_ERR(p);
>
> if p can really be NULL, you'd get ret == 0 here, which is probably
> not what you want.
> But reading d_path, it seems like it's either valid pointer or error,
> so just use IS_ERR above?
>
> > + goto error;
> > + }
> > +
> > + ret = strlen(p);
> > + memmove(dst, p, ret);
> > + dst[ret] = '\0';
>
> I think returning number of useful bytes (including terminating NUL)
> is good and follows bpf_probe_read_str() convention. So ret++ here?
>
> > + goto end;
> > +
> > +error:
> > + memset(dst, '0', size);
> > +end:
> > + fdput(f);
Also I'd prefer fdget_*()'s error path not calling fdput(f).
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +
>
> [...]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-30 15:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-28 14:10 [PATCH bpf-next v4] bpf: add new helper fd2path for mapping a file descriptor to a pathname Wenbo Zhang
2019-10-29 18:48 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2019-10-30 15:32 ` Daniel Borkmann [this message]
2019-11-03 4:10 ` Wenbo Zhang
2019-10-30 16:19 ` Wenbo Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191030153203.GA2675@pc-63.home \
--to=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ethercflow@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.