From: "Li Xinhai" <lixinhai.lxh@gmail.com>
To: akpm <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, yang.shi <yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: "Vlastimil Babka" <vbabka@suse.cz>, mhocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
mgorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: mempolicy: fix the wrong return value and potential pages leak of mbind
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2019 13:28:44 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2019103113284316242158@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20191030213144.dd7cd8084d4171e29abba875@linux-foundation.org
On 2019-10-31 at 12:31 Andrew Morton wrote:
>On Wed, 30 Oct 2019 11:14:58 -0700 Yang Shi <yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>
>> On 10/30/19 9:58 AM, Yang Shi wrote:
>> > The commit d883544515aa ("mm: mempolicy: make the behavior consistent
>> > when MPOL_MF_MOVE* and MPOL_MF_STRICT were specified") fixed the return
>> > value of mbind() for a couple of corner cases. But, it altered the
>> > errno for some other cases, for example, mbind() should return -EFAULT
>> > when part or all of the memory range specified by nodemask and maxnode
>> > points outside your accessible address space, or there was an unmapped
>> > hole in the specified memory range specified by addr and len.
>> >
>> > Fixed this by preserving the errno returned by queue_pages_range().
>> > And, the pagelist may be not empty even though queue_pages_range()
>> > returns error, put the pages back to LRU since mbind_range() is not called
>> > to really apply the policy so those pages should not be migrated, this
>> > is also the old behavior before the problematic commit.
>> Forgot fixes tag.
>>
>> Fixes: d883544515aa ("mm: mempolicy: make the behavior consistent when
>> MPOL_MF_MOVE* and MPOL_MF_STRICT were specified")
>
>What's the relationship between this patch and
>http://lkml.kernel.org/r/201910291756045288126@gmail.com?
>
They are for different issues. I found that -EFAULT is hidden from user space by
d883544515aa when I was fixing the unmapped hole issue which is described in
your quoted link.
Now, it is fixed for by current commit in this mail thread. I will explain the other
one in its thead.
- Xinhai
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-31 5:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-30 16:58 [PATCH] mm: mempolicy: fix the wrong return value and potential pages leak of mbind Yang Shi
2019-10-30 18:14 ` Yang Shi
2019-10-31 1:53 ` Li Xinhai
2019-10-31 4:31 ` Andrew Morton
2019-10-31 5:28 ` Li Xinhai [this message]
2019-10-31 15:47 ` Yang Shi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2019103113284316242158@gmail.com \
--to=lixinhai.lxh@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.