From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 44D76E00BDF; Sun, 3 Nov 2019 10:31:33 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [141.84.69.5 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's * domain * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid X-Greylist: delayed 372 seconds by postgrey-1.32 at yocto-www; Sun, 03 Nov 2019 10:31:30 PST Received: from mail.stusta.mhn.de (mail.stusta.mhn.de [141.84.69.5]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20FB4E007AE for ; Sun, 3 Nov 2019 10:31:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.stusta.mhn.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 475kqv24qlz6r; Sun, 3 Nov 2019 19:25:14 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=stusta.de; s=default; t=1572805516; bh=zA4ZjBqNhbfE5XwT1Aunyi4Tpyty2C9so7AAmwpd54c=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=iIDl+zHmjs57EgMmrfOIF1133xzuV4UNDOqEymvWsybbTl9nvERKQ/ZQ8PVjh/LPM UNbeg1omQ2Adi1iXk7CanjJ3Yf/U1wKeUkb42CC41kP/LxjIHjBhcPgLzNK6C2FMd4 Uw+XIKVynNM3XHECr9MlZH9RPSgiGei962wEB8iNM8DUsEdS8AdqzHQMYdv6lfWXRY 075wy7Gw6UWiRR9+xHq/HT0WCXWnG+CfCfPunSDq3c6GczAIrBKar8/6+pOwPN7Bk4 VJWtKoB5xqBXgWjJ6AAFy1DG9ZxCFodJ/dqWcxvAoxuLqD78zbGEQmoVihEP6qUs3I ooprs/ZjsdZ/gW1IDIpK297WoiYdkp458NwZDD4IPLkfXescIfKfcGxqrBaV0zYv/R z2utwu9zT+EDoo9x4UN4O7Ql+mRncKKBGjThRCeA5XJli35EBvYolTu6ajOXDtRbkm IrpN5seB/zipU0RHnyswPRczhpsSXdU1LA94cBkpjE5Py1ZTc+CtkLxqTZCJHqmXWD 8RpyUhplHVdu2Ypscvbmt8mFhgOR6XuSaXJcdRJhg5/w1Fl2sHWcI+xx3+AAv0ZciL xbFbju9goAQGIXFhJekJ7XRF+p+d41NsgAlVQ/3+04V54a5Jwt3kRvW0wk8evPluRl CkpydihjfGSaHjyEI4/ujLm4= Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2019 20:25:12 +0200 From: Adrian Bunk To: Andrei Gherzan Message-ID: <20191103182512.GA28946@localhost> References: <7D6FCC3C-A8B1-4EE7-875F-E544DCC3B44A@korgrd.com> <097a8fe9-979d-aa3f-68ad-2c9e0bea6853@gherzan.ro> <352DF122-AE8C-4549-A04B-27EEF9A73AE5@gherzan.ro> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <352DF122-AE8C-4549-A04B-27EEF9A73AE5@gherzan.ro> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Cc: Yocto Project , Steve Pavao Subject: Re: [meta-raspberrypi] poky linux build fails if ARM erratum mfix linker switch is specified X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2019 18:31:33 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline On Sun, Nov 03, 2019 at 05:56:45PM +0000, Andrei Gherzan wrote: > On 3 November 2019 13:18:53 GMT, Khem Raj wrote: > >On Sun, Nov 3, 2019 at 2:46 AM Andrei Gherzan > >wrote: > >> I was thinking about this. The erratum seems to show that this > >applies > >> to all revisions of a53. So it sounds like we should add it in > >> `tune-cortexa53.inc`. > >> > > > >Up to r0b4 only so maybe not all a53 implementations are impacted > > > > As far as I know that is the latest revision. Do you mean that newer revision might come up with this fixed? It is fixed in some r0p4 implementations, indicated in REVIDR[8]. cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed