From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
Doug Smythies <dsmythies@telus.net>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpuidle: Consolidate disabled state checks
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2019 12:52:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191104115201.GG4131@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2717750.dCEzHT3DVQ@kreacher>
On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 12:16:17PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
>
> There are two reasons why CPU idle states may be disabled: either
> because the driver has disabled them or because they have been
> disabled by user space via sysfs.
>
> In the former case, the state's "disabled" flag is set once during
> the initialization of the driver and it is never cleared later (it
> is read-only effectively). In the latter case, the "disable" field
> of the given state's cpuidle_state_usage struct is set and it may be
> changed via sysfs. Thus checking whether or not an idle state has
> been disabled involves reading these two flags every time.
>
> In order to avoid the additional check of the state's "disabled" flag
> (which is effectively read-only anyway), use the value of it at the
> init time to set a (new) flag in the "disable" field of that state's
> cpuidle_state_usage structure and use the sysfs interface to
> manipulate another (new) flag in it. This way the state is disabled
> whenever the "disable" field of its cpuidle_state_usage structure is
> nonzero, whatever the reason, and it is the only place to look into
> to check whether or not the state has been disabled.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Much thanks, that always bugged me.
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-04 11:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-04 11:16 [PATCH] cpuidle: Consolidate disabled state checks Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-11-04 11:52 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2019-11-18 4:45 ` Len Brown
2019-11-18 9:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-11-18 11:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-11-18 23:04 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/2] cpuidle: Allow states to be disabled by default (was: Re: [PATCH] cpuidle: Consolidate disabled state checks) Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-11-18 23:07 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/2] cpuidle: Drop disabled field from struct cpuidle_state Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-11-18 23:09 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/2] cpuidle: Allow idle states to be disabled by default Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191104115201.GG4131@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=dsmythies@telus.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.