From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Or Cohen <orcohen@paloaltonetworks.com>
Cc: jslaby@suse.com, nico@fluxnic.net, textshell@uchuujin.de,
daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch, sam@ravnborg.org, mpatocka@redhat.com,
ghalat@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jwilk@jwilk.net,
Nadav Markus <nmarkus@paloaltonetworks.com>,
syzkaller@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Bug report - slab-out-of-bounds in vcs_scr_readw
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2019 16:24:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191104152428.GA2252441@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAM6JnLeEnvjjQPyLeh+8dt5wGNud_vks5k_eXJZy2T1H7ao=hQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 04:39:55AM -0800, Or Cohen wrote:
> Hi,
> I discovered a OOB access bug using Syzkaller and decided to report it,
> as I could not find a similar report in syzkaller mailing list,
> syzkaller-bugs mailing list
> or syzbot dashboard. ( as described in:
> https://github.com/google/syzkaller/blob/master/docs/linux/reporting_kernel_bugs.md
> )
>
> I've tested it and the bug reproduces on the following versions:
>
> commit 4d856f72c10ecb060868ed10ff1b1453943fc6c8 (HEAD, tag: v5.3)
> Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
> Date: Sun Sep 15 14:19:32 2019 -0700
> Linux 5.3
>
> commit 84df9525b0c27f3ebc2ebb1864fa62a97fdedb7d (grafted, HEAD, tag: v4.19)
> Author: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> Date: Mon Oct 22 07:37:37 2018 +0100
> Linux 4.19
>
> The call stack at the time of the crash is as follows: (kernel 5.3)
> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline]
> dump_stack+0x88/0xce lib/dump_stack.c:113
> print_address_description+0x60/0x31f mm/kasan/report.c:351
> __kasan_report.cold.6+0x1a/0x3c mm/kasan/report.c:482
> kasan_report+0xe/0x12 mm/kasan/common.c:618
> vcs_scr_readw+0xb1/0xc0 drivers/tty/vt/vt.c:4665
> vcs_write+0x5c2/0xbb0 drivers/tty/vt/vc_screen.c:545
> do_loop_readv_writev fs/read_write.c:717 [inline]
> do_loop_readv_writev fs/read_write.c:701 [inline]
> do_iter_write fs/read_write.c:972 [inline]
> do_iter_write+0x47b/0x5f0 fs/read_write.c:951
> vfs_writev+0x1b3/0x2f0 fs/read_write.c:1015
> do_writev+0x11f/0x2e0 fs/read_write.c:1058
> do_syscall_64+0xb7/0x3a0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:296
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
>
>
> The overwritten buffer is of size 4000 bytes and is allocated in:
> vc_allocate+0x3b0/0x6d0 drivers/tty/vt/vt.c:1098
>
> >From my brief analysis of the "vcs_write" function ( vc_screen.c ), it
> seems like the
> "screen_pos" function (line 548) is used to return a pointer into the
> overwritten buffer:
>
> 540: while (this_round > 0) {
> 541: unsigned char c = *con_buf0++;
> 542:
> 543: this_round--;
> 544: vcs_scr_writew(vc,
> 545: vcs_scr_readw(vc, org) & 0xff00) | c, org);
> 546: org++;
> 547: if (++col == maxcol) {
> 548: org = screen_pos(vc, p, viewed);
> 549: col = 0;
> 550: p += maxcol;
> 551: }
> 552: }
>
> The "count" argument ( controlled from user space ) affects the
> initialization
> of "this_round".
> After several iterations of the while loop, "screen_pos" returns a pointer
> to offset
> 4000 into the buffer which leads KASAN to detect it as an OOB read of 2
> bytes in "vcs_scr_readw".
> We can see however, that immediately after that "vcs_scr_writew" is called
> which
> leads to a write of 2 bytes past the end of the buffer.
>
> The following files are attached:
> repro.c - A C reproducer for the bug.
Your repo.c file is "interesting" saying you have a giant buffer, yet it
really is just 1 byte long. Does that have something to do with the
problem here?
I am at another conference at the moment and can't look at this much
now, will try to later this week...
thanks,
greg k-h
next parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-04 15:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CAM6JnLeEnvjjQPyLeh+8dt5wGNud_vks5k_eXJZy2T1H7ao=hQ@mail.gmail.com>
2019-11-04 15:24 ` Greg KH [this message]
2019-11-04 15:50 ` Bug report - slab-out-of-bounds in vcs_scr_readw Nicolas Pitre
2019-11-04 16:15 ` Or Cohen
2019-11-04 18:33 ` Nicolas Pitre
2019-11-05 6:54 ` Jiri Slaby
2019-11-05 9:03 ` Or Cohen
2019-11-05 9:14 ` Jiri Slaby
2019-11-05 9:33 ` Nicolas Pitre
2019-11-05 10:29 ` Jiri Slaby
2019-11-05 10:53 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2019-11-05 13:44 ` Nicolas Pitre
2019-11-06 17:01 ` Or Cohen
2019-11-26 21:55 ` Nicolas Pitre
2019-11-27 6:45 ` Greg KH
2019-11-27 16:24 ` Nicolas Pitre
2019-11-27 16:30 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191104152428.GA2252441@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=ghalat@redhat.com \
--cc=jslaby@suse.com \
--cc=jwilk@jwilk.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
--cc=nico@fluxnic.net \
--cc=nmarkus@paloaltonetworks.com \
--cc=orcohen@paloaltonetworks.com \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=syzkaller@googlegroups.com \
--cc=textshell@uchuujin.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.