All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/28] mm: reclaim_state records pages reclaimed, not slabs
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2019 14:58:05 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191104195805.GE10665@bfoster> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191031234618.15403-15-david@fromorbit.com>

On Fri, Nov 01, 2019 at 10:46:04AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> 
> Add a wrapper to account for page freeing in shrinker reclaim so
> that the high level scanning accounts for all the memory freed
> during a shrinker scan.
> 
> No logic changes, just replacing open coded checks with a simple
> wrapper.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> ---

Looks straightforward:

Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>

>  fs/inode.c           |  3 +--
>  fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c     |  4 +---
>  include/linux/swap.h | 20 ++++++++++++++++++--
>  mm/slab.c            |  3 +--
>  mm/slob.c            |  4 +---
>  mm/slub.c            |  3 +--
>  mm/vmscan.c          |  4 ++--
>  7 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/inode.c b/fs/inode.c
> index fef457a42882..a77caf216659 100644
> --- a/fs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/inode.c
> @@ -764,8 +764,7 @@ static enum lru_status inode_lru_isolate(struct list_head *item,
>  				__count_vm_events(KSWAPD_INODESTEAL, reap);
>  			else
>  				__count_vm_events(PGINODESTEAL, reap);
> -			if (current->reclaim_state)
> -				current->reclaim_state->reclaimed_slab += reap;
> +			current_reclaim_account_pages(reap);
>  		}
>  		iput(inode);
>  		spin_lock(lru_lock);
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
> index d34e5d2edacd..55b082bc53b3 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
> @@ -324,9 +324,7 @@ xfs_buf_free(
>  
>  			__free_page(page);
>  		}
> -		if (current->reclaim_state)
> -			current->reclaim_state->reclaimed_slab +=
> -							bp->b_page_count;
> +		current_reclaim_account_pages(bp->b_page_count);
>  	} else if (bp->b_flags & _XBF_KMEM)
>  		kmem_free(bp->b_addr);
>  	_xfs_buf_free_pages(bp);
> diff --git a/include/linux/swap.h b/include/linux/swap.h
> index 063c0c1e112b..72b855fe20b0 100644
> --- a/include/linux/swap.h
> +++ b/include/linux/swap.h
> @@ -126,12 +126,28 @@ union swap_header {
>  
>  /*
>   * current->reclaim_state points to one of these when a task is running
> - * memory reclaim
> + * memory reclaim. It is typically used by shrinkers to return reclaim
> + * information back to the main vmscan loop.
>   */
>  struct reclaim_state {
> -	unsigned long reclaimed_slab;
> +	unsigned long	reclaimed_pages;	/* pages freed by shrinkers */
>  };
>  
> +/*
> + * When code frees a page that may be run from a memory reclaim context, it
> + * needs to account for the pages it frees so memory reclaim can track them.
> + * Slab memory that is freed is accounted via this mechanism, so this is not
> + * necessary for slab or heap memory being freed. However, if the object being
> + * freed frees pages directly, then those pages should be accounted as well when
> + * in memory reclaim. This helper function takes care accounting for the pages
> + * being reclaimed when it is required.
> + */
> +static inline void current_reclaim_account_pages(int nr_pages)
> +{
> +	if (current->reclaim_state)
> +		current->reclaim_state->reclaimed_pages += nr_pages;
> +}
> +
>  #ifdef __KERNEL__
>  
>  struct address_space;
> diff --git a/mm/slab.c b/mm/slab.c
> index 66e5d8032bae..419be005f41a 100644
> --- a/mm/slab.c
> +++ b/mm/slab.c
> @@ -1395,8 +1395,7 @@ static void kmem_freepages(struct kmem_cache *cachep, struct page *page)
>  	page_mapcount_reset(page);
>  	page->mapping = NULL;
>  
> -	if (current->reclaim_state)
> -		current->reclaim_state->reclaimed_slab += 1 << order;
> +	current_reclaim_account_pages(1 << order);
>  	uncharge_slab_page(page, order, cachep);
>  	__free_pages(page, order);
>  }
> diff --git a/mm/slob.c b/mm/slob.c
> index fa53e9f73893..c54a7eeee86d 100644
> --- a/mm/slob.c
> +++ b/mm/slob.c
> @@ -211,9 +211,7 @@ static void slob_free_pages(void *b, int order)
>  {
>  	struct page *sp = virt_to_page(b);
>  
> -	if (current->reclaim_state)
> -		current->reclaim_state->reclaimed_slab += 1 << order;
> -
> +	current_reclaim_account_pages(1 << order);
>  	mod_node_page_state(page_pgdat(sp), NR_SLAB_UNRECLAIMABLE,
>  			    -(1 << order));
>  	__free_pages(sp, order);
> diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> index b25c807a111f..478554082079 100644
> --- a/mm/slub.c
> +++ b/mm/slub.c
> @@ -1746,8 +1746,7 @@ static void __free_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, struct page *page)
>  	__ClearPageSlab(page);
>  
>  	page->mapping = NULL;
> -	if (current->reclaim_state)
> -		current->reclaim_state->reclaimed_slab += pages;
> +	current_reclaim_account_pages(pages);
>  	uncharge_slab_page(page, order, s);
>  	__free_pages(page, order);
>  }
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index 7a8256322150..967e3d3c7748 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -2870,8 +2870,8 @@ static bool shrink_node(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc)
>  		} while ((memcg = mem_cgroup_iter(root, memcg, NULL)));
>  
>  		if (reclaim_state) {
> -			sc->nr_reclaimed += reclaim_state->reclaimed_slab;
> -			reclaim_state->reclaimed_slab = 0;
> +			sc->nr_reclaimed += reclaim_state->reclaimed_pages;
> +			reclaim_state->reclaimed_pages = 0;
>  		}
>  
>  		/* Record the subtree's reclaim efficiency */
> -- 
> 2.24.0.rc0
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2019-11-04 19:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-31 23:45 [PATCH 00/28] mm, xfs: non-blocking inode reclaim Dave Chinner
2019-10-31 23:45 ` [PATCH 01/28] xfs: Lower CIL flush limit for large logs Dave Chinner
2019-10-31 23:45 ` [PATCH 02/28] xfs: Throttle commits on delayed background CIL push Dave Chinner
2019-11-01 12:04   ` Brian Foster
2019-11-01 21:40     ` Dave Chinner
2019-11-04 22:48       ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-10-31 23:45 ` [PATCH 03/28] xfs: don't allow log IO to be throttled Dave Chinner
2019-10-31 23:45 ` [PATCH 04/28] xfs: Improve metadata buffer reclaim accountability Dave Chinner
2019-11-01 12:05   ` Brian Foster
2019-11-04 23:21   ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-10-31 23:45 ` [PATCH 05/28] xfs: correctly acount for reclaimable slabs Dave Chinner
2019-10-31 23:45 ` [PATCH 06/28] xfs: factor common AIL item deletion code Dave Chinner
2019-11-04 23:16   ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-10-31 23:45 ` [PATCH 07/28] xfs: tail updates only need to occur when LSN changes Dave Chinner
2019-11-04 23:18   ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-10-31 23:45 ` [PATCH 08/28] xfs: factor inode lookup from xfs_ifree_cluster Dave Chinner
2019-11-01 12:05   ` Brian Foster
2019-11-04 23:20   ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-10-31 23:45 ` [PATCH 09/28] mm: directed shrinker work deferral Dave Chinner
2019-11-04 15:25   ` Brian Foster
2019-11-14 20:49     ` Dave Chinner
2019-11-15 17:21       ` Brian Foster
2019-11-18  0:49         ` Dave Chinner
2019-11-19 15:12           ` Brian Foster
2019-10-31 23:46 ` [PATCH 10/28] shrinkers: use defer_work for GFP_NOFS sensitive shrinkers Dave Chinner
2019-10-31 23:46 ` [PATCH 11/28] mm: factor shrinker work calculations Dave Chinner
2019-11-02 10:55   ` kbuild test robot
2019-11-02 10:55     ` kbuild test robot
2019-11-04 15:29   ` Brian Foster
2019-11-14 20:59     ` Dave Chinner
2019-10-31 23:46 ` [PATCH 12/28] shrinker: defer work only to kswapd Dave Chinner
2019-11-04 15:29   ` Brian Foster
2019-11-14 21:11     ` Dave Chinner
2019-11-15 17:23       ` Brian Foster
2019-10-31 23:46 ` [PATCH 13/28] shrinker: clean up variable types and tracepoints Dave Chinner
2019-11-04 15:30   ` Brian Foster
2019-10-31 23:46 ` [PATCH 14/28] mm: reclaim_state records pages reclaimed, not slabs Dave Chinner
2019-11-04 19:58   ` Brian Foster [this message]
2019-10-31 23:46 ` [PATCH 15/28] mm: back off direct reclaim on excessive shrinker deferral Dave Chinner
2019-11-04 19:58   ` Brian Foster
2019-11-14 21:28     ` Dave Chinner
2019-10-31 23:46 ` [PATCH 16/28] mm: kswapd backoff for shrinkers Dave Chinner
2019-11-04 19:58   ` Brian Foster
2019-11-14 21:41     ` Dave Chinner
2019-10-31 23:46 ` [PATCH 17/28] xfs: synchronous AIL pushing Dave Chinner
2019-11-05 17:05   ` Brian Foster
2019-10-31 23:46 ` [PATCH 18/28] xfs: don't block kswapd in inode reclaim Dave Chinner
2019-10-31 23:46 ` [PATCH 19/28] xfs: reduce kswapd blocking on inode locking Dave Chinner
2019-11-05 17:05   ` Brian Foster
2019-10-31 23:46 ` [PATCH 20/28] xfs: kill background reclaim work Dave Chinner
2019-11-05 17:05   ` Brian Foster
2019-10-31 23:46 ` [PATCH 21/28] xfs: use AIL pushing for inode reclaim IO Dave Chinner
2019-11-05 17:06   ` Brian Foster
2019-10-31 23:46 ` [PATCH 22/28] xfs: remove mode from xfs_reclaim_inodes() Dave Chinner
2019-10-31 23:46 ` [PATCH 23/28] xfs: track reclaimable inodes using a LRU list Dave Chinner
2019-10-31 23:46 ` [PATCH 24/28] xfs: reclaim inodes from the LRU Dave Chinner
2019-11-06 17:21   ` Brian Foster
2019-11-14 21:51     ` Dave Chinner
2019-10-31 23:46 ` [PATCH 25/28] xfs: remove unusued old inode reclaim code Dave Chinner
2019-11-06 17:21   ` Brian Foster
2019-10-31 23:46 ` [PATCH 26/28] xfs: use xfs_ail_push_all in xfs_reclaim_inodes Dave Chinner
2019-11-06 17:22   ` Brian Foster
2019-11-14 21:53     ` Dave Chinner
2019-10-31 23:46 ` [PATCH 27/28] rwsem: introduce down/up_write_non_owner Dave Chinner
2019-10-31 23:46 ` [PATCH 28/28] xfs: rework unreferenced inode lookups Dave Chinner
2019-11-06 22:18   ` Brian Foster
2019-11-14 22:16     ` Dave Chinner
2019-11-15 13:13       ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-11-15 17:26       ` Brian Foster
2019-11-18  1:00         ` Dave Chinner
2019-11-19 15:13           ` Brian Foster
2019-11-19 21:18             ` Dave Chinner
2019-11-20 12:42               ` Brian Foster

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191104195805.GE10665@bfoster \
    --to=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.