From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BADFCA9EB5 for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 20:46:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0F4320869 for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 20:46:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728510AbfKDUqD (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Nov 2019 15:46:03 -0500 Received: from mga07.intel.com ([134.134.136.100]:15624 "EHLO mga07.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728392AbfKDUqD (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Nov 2019 15:46:03 -0500 X-Amp-Result: UNKNOWN X-Amp-Original-Verdict: FILE UNKNOWN X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga004.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.38]) by orsmga105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 Nov 2019 12:46:02 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.68,268,1569308400"; d="scan'208";a="352936124" Received: from sjchrist-coffee.jf.intel.com (HELO linux.intel.com) ([10.54.74.41]) by orsmga004.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 04 Nov 2019 12:46:02 -0800 Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2019 12:46:02 -0800 From: Sean Christopherson To: Jarkko Sakkinen Cc: linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH for v24 1/3] x86/sgx: Use GFP_KERNEL for allocations Message-ID: <20191104204602.GA5960@linux.intel.com> References: <20191104200141.5385-1-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191104200141.5385-1-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-sgx-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 10:01:39PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > The reasoning is the same as in > > http://git.infradead.org/users/jjs/linux-tpmdd.git/commit/abd55954f91a3aacc1d260d2411cf776ec4d5fd2 > > Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen > --- > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/ioctl.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/ioctl.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/ioctl.c > index 5b28a9c0cb68..d53aee5a64c1 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/ioctl.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/ioctl.c > @@ -259,7 +259,7 @@ static long sgx_ioc_enclave_create(struct sgx_encl *encl, void __user *arg) > if (copy_from_user(&ecreate, arg, sizeof(ecreate))) > return -EFAULT; > > - secs_page = alloc_page(GFP_HIGHUSER); > + secs_page = alloc_page(GFP_KERNEL); > if (!secs_page) > return -ENOMEM; > > @@ -674,7 +674,7 @@ static long sgx_ioc_enclave_init(struct sgx_encl *encl, void __user *arg) > if (copy_from_user(&einit, arg, sizeof(einit))) > return -EFAULT; > > - initp_page = alloc_page(GFP_HIGHUSER); > + initp_page = alloc_page(GFP_KERNEL); Would it make sense to use GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT? The accounting would be weird for the case where userspace is using a builder process, but even in that case it's not flat out wrong to account per-enclave memory allocations. > if (!initp_page) > return -ENOMEM; > > -- > 2.20.1 >