From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 31BD2E00E18; Fri, 8 Nov 2019 12:00:21 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's * domain * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, * medium trust * [198.47.19.141 listed in list.dnswl.org] Received: from fllv0015.ext.ti.com (fllv0015.ext.ti.com [198.47.19.141]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02A18E00E16 for ; Fri, 8 Nov 2019 12:00:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from fllv0034.itg.ti.com ([10.64.40.246]) by fllv0015.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id xA8K0HcY104908 for ; Fri, 8 Nov 2019 14:00:17 -0600 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1573243217; bh=4mrzHXOpBnjQOCqe7lFnyHNuHGGcWzHHQVbYqXcvaUM=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=xpVCCkSiYaTII9fQI+nW0RuXkpZUDooxMRTklMdi2zySZ5Yvp0sOah9xxmiXN4PYb 8xJp9Akr6QtdwE4osER/k0mZImq6stjwdaPuHiCg+cBlKGMGGVzypv253uXwp47gM8 31XUTD4QRLI6pQseNCBgSTeUMPZC3jKPCZOiVZRY= Received: from DLEE108.ent.ti.com (dlee108.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.38]) by fllv0034.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id xA8K0HYg025360 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Fri, 8 Nov 2019 14:00:17 -0600 Received: from DLEE103.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.33) by DLEE108.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.38) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1847.3; Fri, 8 Nov 2019 14:00:17 -0600 Received: from fllv0039.itg.ti.com (10.64.41.19) by DLEE103.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1847.3 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 8 Nov 2019 14:00:01 -0600 Received: from localhost (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by fllv0039.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id xA8K0GPr098747; Fri, 8 Nov 2019 14:00:17 -0600 Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2019 15:00:16 -0500 From: Denys Dmytriyenko To: Jacob Stiffler Message-ID: <20191108200016.GP7264@beryl> References: <1573149037-762-1-git-send-email-j-stiffler@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1573149037-762-1-git-send-email-j-stiffler@ti.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Cc: meta-ti@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: [master/thud][RFC 00/42] Unify PDK sources X-BeenThere: meta-ti@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-ti layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2019 20:00:21 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Nov 07, 2019 at 12:49:55PM -0500, Jacob Stiffler wrote: > The PDK sources have been unified in a single git repository. To > simplify maintenance, a bbclass is added to specify the source > information. This class also extends the unpack task so that each > recipe is only presented with its component sources. This leaves > subsequent tasks (do_compile, etc) identical to previous sources. > > The source repo is not yet available, so submit as an RFC for now. Overall seems fine, but not clear about the version strategy - most recipes drop PV and bump PE, but not all. How would that be handled? Also, not clear about the licensing - will it be the same for entire PDK? I noticed at least one recipe changed LIC_FILES_CHKSUM w/o details... -- Denys