All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "lixinhai.lxh@gmail.com" <lixinhai.lxh@gmail.com>
To: mhocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	 akpm <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	 "Vlastimil Babka" <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	 "Hugh Dickins" <hughd@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: mempolicy: Fix wrong use of maxnode in mempolicy API
Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2019 00:48:01 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2019110900475976433214@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20191108160456.GN15658@dhcp22.suse.cz

On 2019-11-09 at 00:04 Michal Hocko wrote:
>On Fri 08-11-19 23:49:29, Li Xinhai wrote:
>> The maxnode used by mbind(), set_mempolicy() and migrate_pages() is not
>> correctly handled in get_nodes(), where --maxnode cause the calculation
>>   endmask = (1UL << (maxnode % BITS_PER_LONG)) - 1;
>> ignores the highest node ID bit. Then, at
>>   nodes_addr(*nodes)[nlongs-1] &= endmask;
>> the highest node ID bit is cleared. Finally, cause mpol_new() think user
>> does not pass in any node ID, and return EINVAL.
>>
>> The results are:
>> - Application receives EINVAL when only the highest node ID bit is set.
>> - Application recevies no error when other bits set together with the
>>   highest node ID bit, but that highest ID is ignored.
>
>A similar patch has been posted [1] and rejected [2].
>
>[1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1570882789-20579-1-git-send-email-zhangpan26@huawei.com
>[2] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191014091243.GD317@dhcp22.suse.cz
>
>
>--
>Michal Hocko
>SUSE Labs 

I just checked the code in 'history' log for curiosity, this --maxnode seems 
appeared since the very first commit. Mention about this special point of 
maxnode in manpage of these three APIs would be one solution, :).

Xinhai

  reply	other threads:[~2019-11-08 16:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-08 15:49 [PATCH] mm: mempolicy: Fix wrong use of maxnode in mempolicy API Li Xinhai
2019-11-08 16:04 ` Michal Hocko
2019-11-08 16:48   ` lixinhai.lxh [this message]
2019-11-11 10:04     ` Michal Hocko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2019110900475976433214@gmail.com \
    --to=lixinhai.lxh@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.