From: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>,
brouer@redhat.com, netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Regression in mvneta with XDP patches
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2019 17:14:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191111151436.GC4197@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191111150553.GC1105@lunn.ch>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1971 bytes --]
On Nov 11, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 04:33:52PM +0200, Ilias Apalodimas wrote:
> > Hi Andrew,
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 02:46:15PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > > Hi Lorenzo, Jesper, Ilias
> > >
> > > I just found that the XDP patches to mvneta have caused a regression.
> > >
> > > This one breaks networking:
> >
> > Thaks for the report.
> > Looking at the DTS i can see 'buffer-manager' in it. The changes we made were
> > for the driver path software buffer manager.
> > Can you confirm which one your hardware uses?
>
> Hi Ilias
>
> Ah, interesting.
>
> # CONFIG_MVNETA_BM_ENABLE is not set
>
> So in fact it is not being compiled in, so should be falling back to
> software buffer manager.
>
> If i do enable it, then it works. So we are in a corner cases you
> probably never tested. Requested by DT, but not actually available.
>
> Andrew
Maybe I got the issue. If mvneta_bm_port_init fails (e.g. if
CONFIG_MVNETA_BM_ENABLE is not set) rx_offset_correction will be set to a wrong
value. To bisect the issue, could you please test the following patch?
Regards,
Lorenzo
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
index 591d580c68b4..e476fb043379 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
@@ -4944,7 +4944,6 @@ static int mvneta_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
SET_NETDEV_DEV(dev, &pdev->dev);
pp->id = global_port_id++;
- pp->rx_offset_correction = MVNETA_SKB_HEADROOM;
/* Obtain access to BM resources if enabled and already initialized */
bm_node = of_parse_phandle(dn, "buffer-manager", 0);
@@ -4969,6 +4968,9 @@ static int mvneta_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
}
of_node_put(bm_node);
+ if (!pp->bm_priv)
+ pp->rx_offset_correction = MVNETA_SKB_HEADROOM;
+
err = mvneta_init(&pdev->dev, pp);
if (err < 0)
goto err_netdev;
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-11 15:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-11 13:46 Regression in mvneta with XDP patches Andrew Lunn
2019-11-11 14:33 ` Ilias Apalodimas
2019-11-11 15:05 ` Andrew Lunn
2019-11-11 15:14 ` Lorenzo Bianconi [this message]
2019-11-11 15:45 ` Andrew Lunn
2019-11-11 15:15 ` Ilias Apalodimas
2019-11-11 14:37 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2019-11-11 15:09 ` Andrew Lunn
2019-11-11 15:12 ` Ilias Apalodimas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191111151436.GC4197@localhost.localdomain \
--to=lorenzo@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=brouer@redhat.com \
--cc=ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.