From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA001C17441 for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 19:02:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 934B9222C5 for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 19:02:23 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1573498943; bh=orNErqbrr4tO6yUqJftFB1DtVa5WXG7SJAGvXxVIO44=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=c2ANvm1/Yaa1lhRiWApfhuoELG1Wqe4fOzZgLjUq2wAU6z2ynrmELZfeYY8yC6SaS dtB0l9x6tr5ldRXUh+z/cGFZIhv3zMUL/vH+W09v/wPMiN329PIAQSh6FB4fiahSAV 3Ryssi2qAy4jhtvT1uiE0mowFj/ViZP4Mi3rTlvQ= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728828AbfKKStK (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Nov 2019 13:49:10 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:42336 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726834AbfKKStF (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Nov 2019 13:49:05 -0500 Received: from localhost (83-86-89-107.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0A9552184C; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 18:49:03 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1573498144; bh=orNErqbrr4tO6yUqJftFB1DtVa5WXG7SJAGvXxVIO44=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=A1SvfjRPlprz5Ryj8QeUA/hbjBER5+EpOIPB00hCAlHCBA2Z/qC0EkDWTaAInS3w8 cXW7VSZrWm7zWV5cCNMfXoXljVOMAqO1S2+vwZ6gxWbMdf5bSPbPbPxnIrgueQYKFr XrTXEsMTcV41aqOL6tJ9BpdrJOnE6Z+xuAcT6Gj4= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Anand Jain , Qu Wenruo , David Sterba Subject: [PATCH 5.3 036/193] btrfs: tree-checker: Fix wrong check on max devid Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2019 19:26:58 +0100 Message-Id: <20191111181503.665875209@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.24.0 In-Reply-To: <20191111181459.850623879@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20191111181459.850623879@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.66 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Qu Wenruo commit 8bb177d18f114358a57d8ae7e206861b48b8b4de upstream. [BUG] The following script will cause false alert on devid check. #!/bin/bash dev1=/dev/test/test dev2=/dev/test/scratch1 mnt=/mnt/btrfs umount $dev1 &> /dev/null umount $dev2 &> /dev/null umount $mnt &> /dev/null mkfs.btrfs -f $dev1 mount $dev1 $mnt _fail() { echo "!!! FAILED !!!" exit 1 } for ((i = 0; i < 4096; i++)); do btrfs dev add -f $dev2 $mnt || _fail btrfs dev del $dev1 $mnt || _fail dev_tmp=$dev1 dev1=$dev2 dev2=$dev_tmp done [CAUSE] Tree-checker uses BTRFS_MAX_DEVS() and BTRFS_MAX_DEVS_SYS_CHUNK() as upper limit for devid. But we can have devid holes just like above script. So the check for devid is incorrect and could cause false alert. [FIX] Just remove the whole devid check. We don't have any hard requirement for devid assignment. Furthermore, even devid could get corrupted by a bitflip, we still have dev extents verification at mount time, so corrupted data won't sneak in. This fixes fstests btrfs/194. Reported-by: Anand Jain Fixes: ab4ba2e13346 ("btrfs: tree-checker: Verify dev item") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.2+ Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo Reviewed-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c | 8 -------- 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-) --- a/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c @@ -686,9 +686,7 @@ static void dev_item_err(const struct ex static int check_dev_item(struct extent_buffer *leaf, struct btrfs_key *key, int slot) { - struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = leaf->fs_info; struct btrfs_dev_item *ditem; - u64 max_devid = max(BTRFS_MAX_DEVS(fs_info), BTRFS_MAX_DEVS_SYS_CHUNK); if (key->objectid != BTRFS_DEV_ITEMS_OBJECTID) { dev_item_err(leaf, slot, @@ -696,12 +694,6 @@ static int check_dev_item(struct extent_ key->objectid, BTRFS_DEV_ITEMS_OBJECTID); return -EUCLEAN; } - if (key->offset > max_devid) { - dev_item_err(leaf, slot, - "invalid devid: has=%llu expect=[0, %llu]", - key->offset, max_devid); - return -EUCLEAN; - } ditem = btrfs_item_ptr(leaf, slot, struct btrfs_dev_item); if (btrfs_device_id(leaf, ditem) != key->offset) { dev_item_err(leaf, slot,