From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.linutronix.de (193.142.43.55:993) by crypto-ml.lab.linutronix.de with IMAP4-SSL for ; 11 Nov 2019 19:04:01 -0000 Received: from mga18.intel.com ([134.134.136.126]) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1iUEyl-0006ON-KL for speck@linutronix.de; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 20:04:00 +0100 Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2019 11:03:55 -0800 From: mark gross Subject: [MODERATED] Re: The Annnoying Affair has No eXcuses - Bulletin #4 Message-ID: <20191111190355.GA7080@u1904> Reply-To: mgross@linux.intel.com References: <20191111172212.GA2848@u1904> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20191111172212.GA2848@u1904> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: speck@linutronix.de List-ID: On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 09:22:12AM -0800, speck for mark gross wrote: > On Sat, Nov 09, 2019 at 10:39:53PM +0000, speck for Ben Hutchings wrote: > > On Thu, 2019-11-07 at 21:17 +0100, speck for Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > Folks, > > > > > > I've picked up Paolos backports and updated the stable branches > > > linux-5.3.y, linux-4.19.y and linix-4.14.y, which also have been rebased to > > > the latest stable versions. > > > > > > The changes are available as usual from: > > > > > > cvs.ou.linutronix.de:linux/speck/linux > > > > > > Git bundles for the linux-5.3.y, linux-4.19.y and linix-4.14.y branches > > > against their upstream versions are attached. > > > > Here's my backport to 4.9. I've tested the NX fixes for a while, but > > don't have any hardware to test the TAA fixes on. > > > The attached bundle is giving me some challanges ot unbundle. > git bundle unbundle ~/taa-nx-4.9.bundle > error: inflate: data stream error (invalid distance too far back) > fatal: pack has bad object at offset 20842: inflate returned -3 > error: index-pack died > > Never mind. I was able to base64 -id the base64 encode bundle from the main measage body after edition out the text before the enoded content. I don't know why the attachement did not unbundle. Thanks, --mark