From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>, Long Li <longli@microsoft.com>,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>,
Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] nvme-pci: poll IO after batch submission for multi-mapping queue
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2019 21:44:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191111204446.GA26028@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191108035508.26395-3-ming.lei@redhat.com>
On Fri, Nov 08, 2019 at 11:55:08AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> f9dde187fa92("nvme-pci: remove cq check after submission") removes
> cq check after submission, this change actually causes performance
> regression on some NVMe drive in which single nvmeq handles requests
> originated from more than one blk-mq sw queues(call it multi-mapping
> queue).
> Follows test result done on Azure L80sv2 guest with NVMe drive(
> Microsoft Corporation Device b111). This guest has 80 CPUs and 10
> numa nodes, and each NVMe drive supports 8 hw queues.
Have you actually seen this on a real nvme drive as well?
Note that it is kinda silly to limit queues like that in VMs, so I
really don't think we should optimize the driver for this particular
case.
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvme mailing list
Linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-11 20:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-08 3:55 [PATCH 0/2] nvme-pci: improve IO performance via poll after batch submission Ming Lei
2019-11-08 3:55 ` [PATCH 1/2] nvme-pci: move sq/cq_poll lock initialization into nvme_init_queue Ming Lei
2019-11-08 4:12 ` Keith Busch
2019-11-08 7:09 ` Ming Lei
2019-11-08 3:55 ` [PATCH 2/2] nvme-pci: poll IO after batch submission for multi-mapping queue Ming Lei
2019-11-11 20:44 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2019-11-12 0:33 ` Long Li
2019-11-12 1:35 ` Sagi Grimberg
2019-11-12 2:39 ` Ming Lei
2019-11-12 16:25 ` Hannes Reinecke
2019-11-12 16:49 ` Keith Busch
2019-11-12 17:29 ` Hannes Reinecke
2019-11-13 3:05 ` Ming Lei
2019-11-13 3:17 ` Keith Busch
2019-11-13 3:57 ` Ming Lei
2019-11-12 21:20 ` Long Li
2019-11-12 21:36 ` Keith Busch
2019-11-13 0:50 ` Long Li
2019-11-13 2:24 ` Ming Lei
2019-11-12 2:07 ` Ming Lei
2019-11-12 1:44 ` Sagi Grimberg
2019-11-12 9:56 ` Ming Lei
2019-11-12 17:35 ` Sagi Grimberg
2019-11-12 21:17 ` Long Li
2019-11-12 23:44 ` Jens Axboe
2019-11-13 2:47 ` Ming Lei
2019-11-12 18:11 ` Nadolski, Edmund
2019-11-13 13:46 ` Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191111204446.GA26028@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=axboe@fb.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=longli@microsoft.com \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.