All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com,
	peterz@infradead.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
	juri.lelli@redhat.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, mgorman@suse.de,
	dsmythies@telus.net
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
	tglx@linutronix.de, sargun@sargun.me, tj@kernel.org,
	xiexiuqi@huawei.com, xiezhipeng1@huawei.com,
	srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sched/freq: move call to cpufreq_update_util
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2019 16:05:44 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191112150544.GA3664@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1573570093-1340-1-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org>

Le Tuesday 12 Nov 2019 à 15:48:13 (+0100), Vincent Guittot a écrit :
> update_cfs_rq_load_avg() calls cfs_rq_util_change() everytime pelt decays,
> which might be inefficient when cpufreq driver has rate limitation.
> 
> When a task is attached on a CPU, we have call path:
> 
> update_blocked_averages()
>   update_cfs_rq_load_avg()
>     cfs_rq_util_change -- > trig frequency update
>   attach_entity_load_avg()
>     cfs_rq_util_change -- > trig frequency update
> 
> The 1st frequency update will not take into account the utilization of the
> newly attached task and the 2nd one might be discard because of rate
> limitation of the cpufreq driver.
> 
> update_cfs_rq_load_avg() is only called by update_blocked_averages()
> and update_load_avg() so we can move the call to
> {cfs_rq,cpufreq}_util_change() into these 2 functions. It's also
> interesting to notice that update_load_avg() already calls directly
> cfs_rq_util_change() for !SMP case.
> 
> This changes will also ensure that cpufreq_update_util() is called even
> when there is no more CFS rq in the leaf_cfs_rq_list to update but only
> irq, rt or dl pelt signals.
> 
> Reported-by: Doug Smythies <dsmythies@telus.net>
> Fixes: 039ae8bcf7a5 ("sched/fair: Fix O(nr_cgroups) in the load balancing path")
> Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
> 
> ---
> 
> I have just rebased the patch on latest tip/sched/core and made it a proper
> patchset after Doug reported that the problem has diseappeared according to
> his 1st results but tests results are not all based on the same v5.4-rcX
> and with menu instead of teo governor.
> 
>  kernel/sched/fair.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++------------
>  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index e458f52..c93d534 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -3508,9 +3508,6 @@ update_cfs_rq_load_avg(u64 now, struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
>  	cfs_rq->load_last_update_time_copy = sa->last_update_time;
>  #endif
>  
> -	if (decayed)
> -		cfs_rq_util_change(cfs_rq, 0);
> -
>  	return decayed;
>  }
>  
> @@ -3620,8 +3617,12 @@ static inline void update_load_avg(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *s
>  		attach_entity_load_avg(cfs_rq, se, SCHED_CPUFREQ_MIGRATION);
>  		update_tg_load_avg(cfs_rq, 0);
>  
> -	} else if (decayed && (flags & UPDATE_TG))
> -		update_tg_load_avg(cfs_rq, 0);
> +	} else if (decayed) {
> +		cfs_rq_util_change(cfs_rq, 0);
> +
> +		if (flags & UPDATE_TG)
> +			update_tg_load_avg(cfs_rq, 0);
> +	}
>  }
>  
>  #ifndef CONFIG_64BIT
> @@ -7484,6 +7485,7 @@ static void update_blocked_averages(int cpu)
>  	const struct sched_class *curr_class;
>  	struct rq_flags rf;
>  	bool done = true;
> +	int decayed = 0;
>  
>  	rq_lock_irqsave(rq, &rf);
>  	update_rq_clock(rq);
> @@ -7493,9 +7495,9 @@ static void update_blocked_averages(int cpu)
>  	 * that RT, DL and IRQ signals have been updated before updating CFS.
>  	 */
>  	curr_class = rq->curr->sched_class;
> -	update_rt_rq_load_avg(rq_clock_pelt(rq), rq, curr_class == &rt_sched_class);
> -	update_dl_rq_load_avg(rq_clock_pelt(rq), rq, curr_class == &dl_sched_class);
> -	update_irq_load_avg(rq, 0);
> +	decayed |= update_rt_rq_load_avg(rq_clock_pelt(rq), rq, curr_class == &rt_sched_class);
> +	decayed |= update_dl_rq_load_avg(rq_clock_pelt(rq), rq, curr_class == &dl_sched_class);
> +	decayed |= update_irq_load_avg(rq, 0);
>  
>  	/* Don't need periodic decay once load/util_avg are null */
>  	if (others_have_blocked(rq))
> @@ -7529,6 +7531,9 @@ static void update_blocked_averages(int cpu)
>  	}
>  
>  	update_blocked_load_status(rq, !done);
> +
> +	if (decayed)
> +		cpufreq_update_util(rq, 0);
>  	rq_unlock_irqrestore(rq, &rf);
>  }
>  
> @@ -7585,6 +7590,7 @@ static inline void update_blocked_averages(int cpu)
>  	struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = &rq->cfs;
>  	const struct sched_class *curr_class;
>  	struct rq_flags rf;
> +	int decayed = 0;
>  
>  	rq_lock_irqsave(rq, &rf);
>  	update_rq_clock(rq);
> @@ -7594,13 +7600,16 @@ static inline void update_blocked_averages(int cpu)
>  	 * that RT, DL and IRQ signals have been updated before updating CFS.
>  	 */
>  	curr_class = rq->curr->sched_class;
> -	update_rt_rq_load_avg(rq_clock_pelt(rq), rq, curr_class == &rt_sched_class);
> -	update_dl_rq_load_avg(rq_clock_pelt(rq), rq, curr_class == &dl_sched_class);
> -	update_irq_load_avg(rq, 0);
> +	decayed |= update_rt_rq_load_avg(rq_clock_pelt(rq), rq, curr_class == &rt_sched_class);
> +	decayed |= update_dl_rq_load_avg(rq_clock_pelt(rq), rq, curr_class == &dl_sched_class);
> +	decayed |= update_irq_load_avg(rq, 0);
>  
> -	update_cfs_rq_load_avg(cfs_rq_clock_pelt(cfs_rq), cfs_rq);
> +	decayed |= update_cfs_rq_load_avg(cfs_rq_clock_pelt(cfs_rq), cfs_rq);
>  
>  	update_blocked_load_status(rq, cfs_rq_has_blocked(cfs_rq) || others_have_blocked(rq));
> +
> +	if (decayed)
> +		cpufreq_update_util(rq, 0);
>  	rq_unlock_irqrestore(rq, &rf);
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2019-11-12 15:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-12 14:48 [PATCH v2] sched/freq: move call to cpufreq_update_util Vincent Guittot
2019-11-12 15:05 ` Vincent Guittot [this message]
2019-11-12 17:11   ` Valentin Schneider
2019-11-12 17:20     ` Vincent Guittot
2019-11-12 17:44       ` Valentin Schneider
2019-11-13 10:49   ` Dietmar Eggemann
2019-11-13 13:30     ` Vincent Guittot
2019-11-13 14:09       ` Dietmar Eggemann
2019-11-13 17:50         ` Vincent Guittot
2019-11-13 18:09           ` Vincent Guittot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191112150544.GA3664@linaro.org \
    --to=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=dsmythies@telus.net \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sargun@sargun.me \
    --cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=xiexiuqi@huawei.com \
    --cc=xiezhipeng1@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.