From: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
To: Venumadhav Josyula <vjosyula@gmail.com>
Cc: users@dpdk.org, dev@dpdk.org,
Venumadhav Josyula <vjosyula@parallelwireless.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] time taken for allocation of mempool.
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2019 09:32:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191113083217.GC4841@platinum> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+i0PGXsCscS9y8rKR2P8qfjHBunznv8SHX4=ESm0eCYrhP7ZA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Venu,
On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 10:42:07AM +0530, Venumadhav Josyula wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Few more points
>
> Operating system : Centos 7.6
> Logging mechanism : syslog
>
> We have logged using syslog before the call and syslog after the call.
>
> Thanks & Regards
> Venu
>
> On Wed, 13 Nov 2019 at 10:37, Venumadhav Josyula <vjosyula@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi ,
> > We are using 'rte_mempool_create' for allocation of flow memory. This has
> > been there for a while. We just migrated to dpdk-18.11 from dpdk-17.05. Now
> > here is problem statement
> >
> > Problem statement :
> > In new dpdk ( 18.11 ), the 'rte_mempool_create' take approximately ~4.4
> > sec for allocation compared to older dpdk (17.05). We have som 8-9 mempools
> > for our entire product. We do upfront allocation for all of them ( i.e.
> > when dpdk application is coming up). Our application is run to completion
> > model.
> >
> > Questions:-
> > i) is that acceptable / has anybody seen such a thing ?
> > ii) What has changed between two dpdk versions ( 18.11 v/s 17.05 ) from
> > memory perspective ?
Could you give some more details about you use case? (hugepage size, number
of objects, object size, additional mempool flags, ...)
Did you manage to reproduce it in a small test example? We could do some
profiling to investigate.
Thanks for the feedback.
Olivier
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-13 8:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-13 5:07 [dpdk-dev] time taken for allocation of mempool Venumadhav Josyula
2019-11-13 5:12 ` Venumadhav Josyula
2019-11-13 8:32 ` Olivier Matz [this message]
2019-11-13 9:11 ` Venumadhav Josyula
2019-11-13 9:30 ` Olivier Matz
2019-11-13 9:19 ` Bruce Richardson
2019-11-13 17:26 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-11-13 21:01 ` Venumadhav Josyula
2019-11-14 9:44 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-11-14 9:50 ` Venumadhav Josyula
2019-11-14 9:57 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-11-18 16:43 ` Venumadhav Josyula
2019-12-06 10:47 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-12-06 10:49 ` Venumadhav Josyula
2019-11-14 8:12 ` Venumadhav Josyula
2019-11-14 9:49 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-11-14 9:53 ` Venumadhav Josyula
2019-11-18 16:45 ` Venumadhav Josyula
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191113083217.GC4841@platinum \
--to=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=users@dpdk.org \
--cc=vjosyula@gmail.com \
--cc=vjosyula@parallelwireless.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.