From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CBEEC43141 for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 07:35:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 453E3206E1 for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 07:35:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725965AbfKNHfF (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Nov 2019 02:35:05 -0500 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:38005 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725914AbfKNHfF (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Nov 2019 02:35:05 -0500 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 910B768AFE; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 08:34:59 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 08:34:59 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Nicolas Saenz Julienne Cc: Dave Hansen , Andy Lutomirski , Peter Zijlstra , Bjorn Helgaas , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Hanjun Guo , Sudeep Holla , Jens Axboe , Joerg Roedel , Rob Herring , Frank Rowand , Christoph Hellwig , Marek Szyprowski , Robin Murphy , phil@raspberrypi.org, Ralf Baechle , Paul Burton , James Hogan , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , Michael Ellerman , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , "H. Peter Anvin" , x86@kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Len Brown , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] dma-mapping: treat dev->bus_dma_mask as a DMA limit Message-ID: <20191114073459.GB26546@lst.de> References: <20191113161340.27228-1-nsaenzjulienne@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191113161340.27228-1-nsaenzjulienne@suse.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 05:13:39PM +0100, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote: > Using a mask to represent bus DMA constraints has a set of limitations. > The biggest one being it can only hold a power of two (minus one). The > DMA mapping code is already aware of this and treats dev->bus_dma_mask > as a limit. This quirk is already used by some architectures although > still rare. > > With the introduction of the Raspberry Pi 4 we've found a new contender > for the use of bus DMA limits, as its PCIe bus can only address the > lower 3GB of memory (of a total of 4GB). This is impossible to represent > with a mask. To make things worse the device-tree code rounds non power > of two bus DMA limits to the next power of two, which is unacceptable in > this case. > > In the light of this, rename dev->bus_dma_mask to dev->bus_dma_limit all > over the tree and treat it as such. Note that dev->bus_dma_limit is > meant to contain the higher accesible DMA address. This looks sensible modulo the minor comments in this thread. > > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne > > --- > > Note this is rebased on top of Christoph's latest DMA series: > https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg768600.html FYI, I'll plan to merge those tonight unless anyone screams. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE955C33C9B for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 07:35:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org (mail.linuxfoundation.org [140.211.169.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7666206E1 for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 07:35:06 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org A7666206E1 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lst.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=iommu-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Received: from mail.linux-foundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D30DACD; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 07:35:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C45E0408 for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 07:35:04 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34C008A for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 07:35:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 910B768AFE; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 08:34:59 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 08:34:59 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Nicolas Saenz Julienne Subject: Re: [PATCH] dma-mapping: treat dev->bus_dma_mask as a DMA limit Message-ID: <20191114073459.GB26546@lst.de> References: <20191113161340.27228-1-nsaenzjulienne@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191113161340.27228-1-nsaenzjulienne@suse.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Dave Hansen , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras , Hanjun Guo , Frank Rowand , Christoph Hellwig , "H. Peter Anvin" , Paul Burton , Michael Ellerman , x86@kernel.org, phil@raspberrypi.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , James Hogan , Len Brown , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring , Borislav Petkov , Andy Lutomirski , Bjorn Helgaas , Thomas Gleixner , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Jens Axboe , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Ralf Baechle , iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, Sudeep Holla , Robin Murphy X-BeenThere: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues for Linux IOMMU support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: iommu-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: iommu-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 05:13:39PM +0100, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote: > Using a mask to represent bus DMA constraints has a set of limitations. > The biggest one being it can only hold a power of two (minus one). The > DMA mapping code is already aware of this and treats dev->bus_dma_mask > as a limit. This quirk is already used by some architectures although > still rare. > > With the introduction of the Raspberry Pi 4 we've found a new contender > for the use of bus DMA limits, as its PCIe bus can only address the > lower 3GB of memory (of a total of 4GB). This is impossible to represent > with a mask. To make things worse the device-tree code rounds non power > of two bus DMA limits to the next power of two, which is unacceptable in > this case. > > In the light of this, rename dev->bus_dma_mask to dev->bus_dma_limit all > over the tree and treat it as such. Note that dev->bus_dma_limit is > meant to contain the higher accesible DMA address. This looks sensible modulo the minor comments in this thread. > > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne > > --- > > Note this is rebased on top of Christoph's latest DMA series: > https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg768600.html FYI, I'll plan to merge those tonight unless anyone screams. _______________________________________________ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7054C432C3 for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 07:37:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2729206DB for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 07:37:10 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org E2729206DB Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lst.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47DCx02BkDzF3mt for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 18:37:08 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=lst.de (client-ip=213.95.11.211; helo=verein.lst.de; envelope-from=hch@lst.de; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lst.de Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47DCtg0x7HzF0cT for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 18:35:06 +1100 (AEDT) Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 910B768AFE; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 08:34:59 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 08:34:59 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Nicolas Saenz Julienne Subject: Re: [PATCH] dma-mapping: treat dev->bus_dma_mask as a DMA limit Message-ID: <20191114073459.GB26546@lst.de> References: <20191113161340.27228-1-nsaenzjulienne@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191113161340.27228-1-nsaenzjulienne@suse.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Dave Hansen , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras , Hanjun Guo , Frank Rowand , Christoph Hellwig , Marek Szyprowski , Lorenzo Pieralisi , "H. Peter Anvin" , Paul Burton , Joerg Roedel , x86@kernel.org, phil@raspberrypi.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , James Hogan , Len Brown , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring , Borislav Petkov , Andy Lutomirski , Bjorn Helgaas , Thomas Gleixner , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Jens Axboe , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Ralf Baechle , iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, Sudeep Holla , Robin Murphy Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 05:13:39PM +0100, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote: > Using a mask to represent bus DMA constraints has a set of limitations. > The biggest one being it can only hold a power of two (minus one). The > DMA mapping code is already aware of this and treats dev->bus_dma_mask > as a limit. This quirk is already used by some architectures although > still rare. > > With the introduction of the Raspberry Pi 4 we've found a new contender > for the use of bus DMA limits, as its PCIe bus can only address the > lower 3GB of memory (of a total of 4GB). This is impossible to represent > with a mask. To make things worse the device-tree code rounds non power > of two bus DMA limits to the next power of two, which is unacceptable in > this case. > > In the light of this, rename dev->bus_dma_mask to dev->bus_dma_limit all > over the tree and treat it as such. Note that dev->bus_dma_limit is > meant to contain the higher accesible DMA address. This looks sensible modulo the minor comments in this thread. > > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne > > --- > > Note this is rebased on top of Christoph's latest DMA series: > https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg768600.html FYI, I'll plan to merge those tonight unless anyone screams. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D49F1C432C3 for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 07:35:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8889206E1 for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 07:35:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="BsxBUSMu" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org A8889206E1 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lst.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=Y0uI7b44MlTueeuWCo0E9fz+xzt6Kd4zPKKvNfE7D44=; b=BsxBUSMuD6ZrT8 kaEQaQX19gWCOXrgXOVr/BgiMb/a6VZzZp1sgjPD+7Om3xtFcXojqgH1jc/3AZH2iHtWZXbUQ2N6i 3g87WDJzc+sAjZgjr7epqgXO6BM7wWIwzbszygcavLj2k+GJG6KX4w4KpGvzvim/fwnofZUA1b1XG D8yP804DzhOCxAcKhchZYbgYGaUlLHKcXNnEEBgDaXQCd3/XCW/HopNXgnMojOgEmOdQkDL63iQ7I KD0Li0aOk57qi8rc7XOwD+nbsj00j/Ol0oTmIOF5k7GIdLhkAu6rQiJ+S//qjvx7sJTWgayuwguN4 OlcNMQTYeNfW/14WMa1A==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1iV9ep-0002hq-51; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 07:35:11 +0000 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1iV9el-0001hW-Q8 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 07:35:09 +0000 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 910B768AFE; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 08:34:59 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 08:34:59 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Nicolas Saenz Julienne Subject: Re: [PATCH] dma-mapping: treat dev->bus_dma_mask as a DMA limit Message-ID: <20191114073459.GB26546@lst.de> References: <20191113161340.27228-1-nsaenzjulienne@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191113161340.27228-1-nsaenzjulienne@suse.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20191113_233508_013180_55BB24EF X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 15.05 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Dave Hansen , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras , Hanjun Guo , Frank Rowand , Christoph Hellwig , Marek Szyprowski , Lorenzo Pieralisi , "H. Peter Anvin" , Paul Burton , Michael Ellerman , Joerg Roedel , x86@kernel.org, phil@raspberrypi.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , James Hogan , Len Brown , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring , Borislav Petkov , Andy Lutomirski , Bjorn Helgaas , Thomas Gleixner , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Jens Axboe , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Ralf Baechle , iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, Sudeep Holla , Robin Murphy Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 05:13:39PM +0100, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote: > Using a mask to represent bus DMA constraints has a set of limitations. > The biggest one being it can only hold a power of two (minus one). The > DMA mapping code is already aware of this and treats dev->bus_dma_mask > as a limit. This quirk is already used by some architectures although > still rare. > > With the introduction of the Raspberry Pi 4 we've found a new contender > for the use of bus DMA limits, as its PCIe bus can only address the > lower 3GB of memory (of a total of 4GB). This is impossible to represent > with a mask. To make things worse the device-tree code rounds non power > of two bus DMA limits to the next power of two, which is unacceptable in > this case. > > In the light of this, rename dev->bus_dma_mask to dev->bus_dma_limit all > over the tree and treat it as such. Note that dev->bus_dma_limit is > meant to contain the higher accesible DMA address. This looks sensible modulo the minor comments in this thread. > > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne > > --- > > Note this is rebased on top of Christoph's latest DMA series: > https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg768600.html FYI, I'll plan to merge those tonight unless anyone screams. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel