All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	kasan-dev <kasan-dev@googlegroups.com>,
	Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 19 (kcsan)
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 19:34:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191119183407.GA68739@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fb7e25d8-aba4-3dcf-7761-cb7ecb3ebb71@infradead.org>

On Tue, 19 Nov 2019, Randy Dunlap wrote:

> On 11/19/19 8:12 AM, Marco Elver wrote:
> > On Tue, 19 Nov 2019 at 16:11, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 11/19/19 12:46 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> Changes since 20191118:
> >>>
> >>
> >> on x86_64:
> >>
> >> It seems that this function can already be known by the compiler as a
> >> builtin:
> >>
> >> ../kernel/kcsan/core.c:619:6: warning: conflicting types for built-in function ‘__tsan_func_exit’ [-Wbuiltin-declaration-mismatch]
> >>  void __tsan_func_exit(void)
> >>       ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >>
> >>
> >> $ gcc --version
> >> gcc (SUSE Linux) 7.4.1 20190905 [gcc-7-branch revision 275407]
> > 
> > Interesting. Could you share the .config? So far I haven't been able
> > to reproduce.
> 
> Sure, it's attached.

Thanks, the config did the trick, even for gcc 9.0.0.

The problem is CONFIG_UBSAN=y. We haven't explicitly disallowed it like
with KASAN. In principle there should be nothing wrong with KCSAN+UBSAN.

There are 3 options:
1. Just disable UBSAN for KCSAN, and also disable KCSAN for UBSAN.
2. Restrict the config to not allow combining KCSAN and UBSAN.
3. Leave things as-is.

Option 1 probably makes most sense, and I'll send a patch for that
unless there are major objections.

> > I can get the warning if I manually add -fsanitize=thread to flags for
> > kcsan/core.c (but normally disabled via KCSAN_SANITIZE := n). If
> > possible could you also share the output of `make V=1` for
> > kcsan/core.c?
> 
> here:

>   gcc -Wp,-MD,kernel/kcsan/.core.o.d  -nostdinc -isystem /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/7/include -I../arch/x86/include -I./arch/x86/include/generated -I../include -I./include -I../arch/x86/include/uapi -I./arch/x86/include/generated/uapi -I../include/uapi -I./include/generated/uapi -include ../include/linux/kconfig.h -include ../include/linux/compiler_types.h -D__KERNEL__ -Wall -Wundef -Werror=strict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -fshort-wchar -fno-PIE -Werror=implicit-function-declaration -Werror=implicit-int -Wno-format-security -std=gnu89 -mno-sse -mno-mmx -mno-sse2 -mno-3dnow -mno-avx -m64 -falign-jumps=1 -falign-loops=1 -mno-80387 -mno-fp-ret-in-387 -mpreferred-stack-boundary=3 -mskip-rax-setup -mtune=generic -mno-red-zone -mcmodel=kernel -DCONFIG_AS_CFI=1 -DCONFIG_AS_CFI_SIGNAL_FRAME=1 -DCONFIG_AS_CFI_SECTIONS=1 -DCONFIG_AS_SSSE3=1 -DCONFIG_AS_AVX=1 -DCONFIG_AS_AVX2=1 -DCONFIG_AS_AVX512=1 -DCONFIG_AS_SHA1_NI=1 -DCONFIG_AS_SHA256_NI=1 -Wno-sign-compare -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks -Wno-frame-address -Wno-format-truncation -Wno-format-overflow -O2 --param=allow-store-data-races=0 -Wframe-larger-than=2048 -fno-stack-protector -Wno-unused-but-set-variable -Wimplicit-fallthrough -Wno-unused-const-variable -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fno-optimize-sibling-calls -fno-var-tracking-assignments -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wvla -Wno-pointer-sign -fno-strict-overflow -fno-merge-all-constants -fmerge-constants -fno-stack-check -fconserve-stack -Werror=date-time -Werror=incompatible-pointer-types -Werror=designated-init -fno-conserve-stack -fno-stack-protector  -fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage -fno-tree-loop-im -Wno-maybe-uninitialized    -fsanitize=shift  -fsanitize=integer-divide-by-zero  -fsanitize=unreachable  -fsanitize=signed-integer-overflow  -fsanitize=bounds  -fsanitize=object-size  -fsanitize=bool  -fsanitize=enum  -Wno-maybe-uninitialized   -I ../kernel/kcsan -I ./kernel/kcsan    -DKBUILD_BASENAME='"core"' -DKBUILD_MODNAME='"core"' -c -o kernel/kcsan/core.o ../kernel/kcsan/core.c
> ../kernel/kcsan/core.c:619:6: warning: conflicting types for built-in function ‘__tsan_func_exit’ [-Wbuiltin-declaration-mismatch]

Adding '-fsanitize=<anything>' seems to make gcc think that these are
builtins. So this is partially also a gcc problem, but if we disable all
sanitizers with the runtime, then this goes away.

Thanks,
-- Marco

  reply	other threads:[~2019-11-19 18:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-19  8:46 linux-next: Tree for Nov 19 Stephen Rothwell
2019-11-19 15:11 ` linux-next: Tree for Nov 19 (kcsan) Randy Dunlap
2019-11-19 16:12   ` Marco Elver
2019-11-19 16:50     ` Randy Dunlap
2019-11-19 18:34       ` Marco Elver [this message]
2019-11-19 18:57         ` [PATCH -next] kcsan, ubsan: Make KCSAN+UBSAN work together Marco Elver
2019-11-19 20:16           ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-11-19 21:07           ` Randy Dunlap
2019-11-19 21:17             ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-11-19 19:02         ` linux-next: Tree for Nov 19 (kcsan) Qian Cai
2019-11-19 19:05           ` Marco Elver
2019-11-19 20:14             ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-11-19 15:13 ` linux-next: Tree for Nov 19 (bpf) Randy Dunlap
2019-11-27 23:45   ` linux-next: Tree for Nov 19 (bpf/btf) Randy Dunlap
2019-11-19 15:33 ` linux-next: Tree for Nov 19 (i915) Randy Dunlap
2019-11-19 15:33   ` [Intel-gfx] " Randy Dunlap
2019-11-19 15:33   ` Randy Dunlap
2019-11-19 15:33   ` Randy Dunlap
2019-11-20 16:15   ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
2019-11-20 16:15     ` Jani Nikula
2019-11-20 16:15     ` Jani Nikula
2019-11-20 16:56     ` Chris Wilson
2019-11-20 16:56       ` Chris Wilson
2019-11-20 16:56       ` Chris Wilson
2019-11-20 21:54       ` Randy Dunlap
2019-11-20 21:54         ` Randy Dunlap
2019-11-20 21:54         ` Randy Dunlap
2019-11-19 15:38 ` linux-next: Tree for Nov 19 (objtool) Randy Dunlap
2019-11-20 23:14 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for linux-next: Tree for Nov 19 (i915) Patchwork
2019-11-20 23:14   ` [Intel-gfx] " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191119183407.GA68739@google.com \
    --to=elver@google.com \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.