From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
x86@kernel.org, Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] x86/traps: Print non-canonical address on #GP
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2019 12:24:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191120112408.GC2634@zn.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191120111859.GA115930@gmail.com>
On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 12:18:59PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> How was this maximum string length of '90' derived? In what way will
> that have to change if someone changes the message?
That was me counting the string length in a dirty patch in a previous
thread. We probably should say why we decided for a certain length and
maybe have a define for it.
Also, I could use your opinion on this here:
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191118164407.GH6363@zn.tnic
and the following mail.
I think that marking the splat with its number would *immensely* help us
with the question: was this the first splat or wasn't? A question we've
been asking since I got involved in kernel development. :)
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-20 11:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-20 10:36 [PATCH v3 1/4] x86/insn-eval: Add support for 64-bit kernel mode Jann Horn
2019-11-20 10:36 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] x86/traps: Print non-canonical address on #GP Jann Horn
2019-11-20 11:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2019-11-20 11:24 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2019-11-20 12:25 ` Jann Horn
2019-11-20 12:41 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-11-20 13:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2019-11-20 13:23 ` Jann Horn
2019-11-20 14:05 ` Ingo Molnar
2019-11-20 12:14 ` Jann Horn
2019-11-20 12:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2019-11-20 12:39 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-11-20 12:42 ` Jann Horn
2019-11-20 13:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2019-11-20 13:39 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-11-20 16:21 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-11-20 17:37 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-11-20 10:36 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] x86/dumpstack: Split out header line printing from __die() Jann Horn
2019-11-20 10:36 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] x86/kasan: Print original address on #GP Jann Horn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191120112408.GC2634@zn.tnic \
--to=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andreyknvl@google.com \
--cc=aryabinin@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.