Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] Convert Ocelot and Felix switches to PHYLINK

[Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>]

> Not really, at that point it was OK to have interface
> PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_NA. There were few more checks before creating the
> network device. Now with your changes you were creating
> a network device for each port of the soc even if some ports
> were not used on a board.

That does not sound right. If the port is not used, the DSA core will
call port_disable() to allow the driver to power off the port. It will
not create a network device for it.

Or is this just an issue with the switchdev driver, not the DSA
driver?

	Andrew
> > >                 serdes = devm_of_phy_get(ocelot->dev, portnp, NULL);
> > > -               if (IS_ERR(serdes)) {
> > > -                       err = PTR_ERR(serdes);
> > > -                       if (err == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> > > -                               dev_dbg(ocelot->dev, "deferring probe\n");
> > 
> > Why did you remove the probe deferral for the serdes phy?
> Because not all the ports have the "phys" property.

You probably need to differentiate between ENODEV and EPROBE_DEFER.
You definitely do need to return EPROBE_DEFER if you get that.  Shame
you cannot use devm_phy_optional_get().

    Andrew