[LTP] [PATCH v4 1/5] syscalls/quotactl01: Add Q_GETNEXTQUOTA test

[Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>]

Hi Xu,

> > + general question: do we want always test against kernel headers or libc
> > headers? Libc is often outdated, so mostly it'd be our fallback to be tested.
> > Ideally both kernel and libc header should be tested, but that's not easily
> > achievable.

> IMHO, We often test libc and it usually includes kernel headers ie.
> <sys/quota.h> <sys/prctl.h>. I perfet to check one except that glibc and
> kernel they have themselves implementation . If the struct or variable is
> not defined, we can define it in ltp lapi headers. Then we can avoid build
> error and increase coverage(because kernel may implement it).

Yep. I'm ok with using libc headers (increased coverage), but we need good
checks anyway for other libc (at least for musl; bionic also like glibc uses
internally kernel headers, uclibc-ng usually embeds kernel header parts and
strives to be glibc compatible anyway).

Kind regards,
Petr