From: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@linux.microsoft.com>
To: zohar@linux.ibm.com, eric.snowberg@oracle.com,
linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v0] IMA: Check IMA policy flag
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 09:14:44 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191121171444.2797-1-nramas@linux.microsoft.com> (raw)
process_buffer_measurement() needs to check if ima_policy_flag
is set to measure and\or appraise. Not doing this check can
result in kernel panic (such as when process_buffer_measurement()
is called before IMA is initialized).
Please see one instance reported by Eric Snowberg
(eric.snowberg@oracle.com) when testing key measurement:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-integrity/20191118223818.3353-1-nramas@linux.microsoft.com/T/#mc243b065659d43a7f5070a2383979542f10d58d1
This change adds the check in process_buffer_measurement()
to return immediately if ima_policy_flag is set to 0.
[ 1.185105] Loading compiled-in X.509 certificates
[ 1.190240] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000
[ 1.191835] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
[ 1.193041] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
[ 1.222749] Call Trace:
[ 1.223344] ? crypto_destroy_tfm+0x5f/0xb0
[ 1.224315] ima_get_action+0x2c/0x30
[ 1.225148] process_buffer_measurement+0x1da/0x230
[ 1.226306] ima_post_key_create_or_update+0x3b/0x40
[ 1.227459] key_create_or_update+0x371/0x5c0
[ 1.228494] load_system_certificate_list+0x99/0xfa
[ 1.229588] ? system_trusted_keyring_init+0xfb/0xfb
[ 1.230705] ? do_early_param+0x95/0x95
[ 1.231574] do_one_initcall+0x4a/0x1fa
[ 1.232444] ? do_early_param+0x95/0x95
[ 1.233313] kernel_init_freeable+0x1c2/0x267
[ 1.234300] ? rest_init+0xb0/0xb0
[ 1.235075] kernel_init+0xe/0x110
[ 1.235842] ret_from_fork+0x24/0x50
Signed-off-by: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@linux.microsoft.com>
---
security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
index 60027c643ecd..c9374430bb72 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
@@ -651,6 +651,9 @@ static void process_buffer_measurement(const void *buf, int size,
int pcr = CONFIG_IMA_MEASURE_PCR_IDX;
int action = 0;
+ if (!ima_policy_flag)
+ return;
+
action = ima_get_action(NULL, cred, secid, 0, KEXEC_CMDLINE, &pcr,
&template_desc);
if (!(action & IMA_MEASURE))
--
2.17.1
next reply other threads:[~2019-11-21 17:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-21 17:14 Lakshmi Ramasubramanian [this message]
2019-11-25 18:23 ` [PATCH v0] IMA: Check IMA policy flag Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2019-11-25 18:30 ` Mimi Zohar
2019-11-27 2:09 ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191121171444.2797-1-nramas@linux.microsoft.com \
--to=nramas@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=eric.snowberg@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.