All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, will@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spinlock_debug: Fix various data races
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 19:32:57 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191121183257.GA124760@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191120155715.28089-1-elver@google.com>


* Marco Elver <elver@google.com> wrote:

>  static inline void debug_spin_lock_after(raw_spinlock_t *lock)
>  {
> -	lock->owner_cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
> -	lock->owner = current;
> +	WRITE_ONCE(lock->owner_cpu, raw_smp_processor_id());
> +	WRITE_ONCE(lock->owner, current);
>  }

debug_spin_lock_after() runs inside the spinlock itself - why do these 
writes have to be WRITE_ONCE()?

> @@ -197,8 +197,8 @@ static inline void debug_write_unlock(rwlock_t *lock)
>  	RWLOCK_BUG_ON(lock->owner != current, lock, "wrong owner");
>  	RWLOCK_BUG_ON(lock->owner_cpu != raw_smp_processor_id(),
>  							lock, "wrong CPU");
> -	lock->owner = SPINLOCK_OWNER_INIT;
> -	lock->owner_cpu = -1;
> +	WRITE_ONCE(lock->owner, SPINLOCK_OWNER_INIT);
> +	WRITE_ONCE(lock->owner_cpu, -1);
>  }

This too is running inside the critical section of the spinlock - why are 
the WRITE_ONCE() calls necessary?

Thanks,

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2019-11-21 18:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-20 15:57 [PATCH] spinlock_debug: Fix various data races Marco Elver
2019-11-21 18:32 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2019-11-21 19:44   ` Marco Elver
2019-11-29  7:04     ` Ingo Molnar
2019-11-29  9:59 ` [tip: locking/core] locking/spinlock/debug: " tip-bot2 for Marco Elver

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191121183257.GA124760@gmail.com \
    --to=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=cai@lca.pw \
    --cc=elver@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.