From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sasha Levin Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] virtio_console: allocate inbufs in add_port() only if it is needed Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 07:00:08 +0000 Message-ID: <20191122070009.5CE442068E@mail.kernel.org> References: <20191114122548.24364-1-lvivier@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20191114122548.24364-1-lvivier@redhat.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Sender: "Virtualization" To: Sasha Levin , Laurent Vivier , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: mst@redhat.com, stable@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org Hi, [This is an automated email] This commit has been processed because it contains a "Fixes:" tag, fixing commit: a7a69ec0d8e4 ("virtio_console: free buffers after reset"). The bot has tested the following trees: v5.3.11, v4.19.84, v4.14.154, v4.9.201, v4.4.201. v5.3.11: Build OK! v4.19.84: Build OK! v4.14.154: Build OK! v4.9.201: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: 5c60300d68da ("virtio_console: reset on out of memory") v4.4.201: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: 5c60300d68da ("virtio_console: reset on out of memory") NOTE: The patch will not be queued to stable trees until it is upstream. How should we proceed with this patch? -- Thanks, Sasha