From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Cc: virtio@lists.oasis-open.org, virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org,
virtio-comment@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [virtio] Re: [virtio-dev] [PATCH] content: add vendor specific cfg type
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 03:11:43 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191125025608-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e4cc37c2-ac51-6260-b615-67222bbad1a5@siemens.com>
On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 08:45:52AM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 28.10.19 11:55, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > Vendors might want to add their own capability
> > in the PCI capability list. However, Virtio already
> > uses the vendor specific capability ID (0x09)
> > for its own purposes.
>
> Did some vendor express that need, or do we only assume it so far? IOW: Do
> we know at least once concrete use case?
Good point, I should have added this in the log.
I know of a device that implements virtio and has a bug.
Device is a transitional one so can not have vendor specific
subsystem IDs (that violates the SHOULD below. Do we want to qualify
that this recommendation is for non-transitional devices?). While that
specific device can't be fixed like this on bare metal, it creates a consistent way
for future devices to trigger vendor/device specific quirks,
and it creates an option for the hypervisor to add the capability.
> >
> > Provide a structure for vendor specific extensions.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > content.tex | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 80 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/content.tex b/content.tex
> > index b1ea9b9..8a79b03 100644
> > --- a/content.tex
> > +++ b/content.tex
> > @@ -691,6 +691,8 @@ \subsection{Virtio Structure PCI Capabilities}\label{sec:Virtio Transport Option
> > #define VIRTIO_PCI_CAP_PCI_CFG 5
> > /* Shared memory region */
> > #define VIRTIO_PCI_CAP_SHARED_MEMORY_CFG 8
> > +/* Vendor-specific data */
> > +#define VIRTIO_PCI_CAP_VENDOR_CFG 9
> > \end{lstlisting}
> > Any other value is reserved for future use.
> > @@ -1099,6 +1101,84 @@ \subsubsection{Shared memory capability}\label{sec:Virtio Transport Options / Vi
> > The \field{cap.id} MUST be unique for any one device instance.
> > +\devicenormative{\paragraph}{Device-specific configuration}{Virtio Transport Options / Virtio Over PCI Bus / PCI Device Layout / Shared memory capability}
> > +
> > +The region defined by the combination of the \field {cap.offset},
> > +\field {cap.offset_hi}, and \field {cap.length}, \field
> > +{cap.length_hi} fields MUST be contained within the declared bar.
> > +
> > +The \field{cap.id} MUST be unique for any one device instance.
> > +
> > +\subsubsection{Vendor data capability}\label{sec:Virtio
> > +Transport Options / Virtio Over PCI Bus / PCI Device Layout /
> > +Vendor data capability}
> > +
> > +The optional Vendor data capability allows the device to present
> > +vendor-specific data to the driver, without
> > +conflicts, for debugging and/or reporting purposes,
> > +and without conflicting with standard functionality.
> > +
> > +This capability augments but does not replace the standard
> > +subsystem ID and subsystem vendor ID fields
> > +(offsets 0x2C and 0x2E in the PCI configuration space header)
> > +as specified by \hyperref[intro:PCI]{[PCI]}.
> > +
> > +Vendor data capability is enumerated on the PCI transport
> > +as a VIRTIO_PCI_CAP_VENDOR_CFG capability.
> > +
> > +The capability has the following structure:
> > +\begin{lstlisting}
> > +struct virtio_pci_vndr_data {
> > + u8 cap_vndr; /* Generic PCI field: PCI_CAP_ID_VNDR */
> > + u8 cap_next; /* Generic PCI field: next ptr. */
> > + u8 cap_len; /* Generic PCI field: capability length */
> > + u8 cfg_type; /* Identifies the structure. */
> > + u16 vendor_id; /* Identifies the vendor-specific format. */
> > + /* For Vendor Definition */
> > + /* Pads structure to a multiple of 4 bytes */
> > + /* Reads must not have side effects */
> > +};
> > +\end{lstlisting}
> > +
> > +Where \field{vendor_id} identifies the PCI-SIG assigned Vendor ID
> > +as specified by \hyperref[intro:PCI]{[PCI]}.
> > +
> > +Note that the capability size is required to be a multiple of 4.
> > +
> > +To make it safe for a generic driver to access the capability,
> > +reads from this capability MUST NOT have any side effects.
> > +
> > +\devicenormative{\subsection}{Vendor data capability}{Virtio
> > +Transport Options / Virtio Over PCI Bus / PCI Device Layout /
> > +Vendor data capability}
> > +
> > +The device SHOULD present the PCI subsystem vendor ID matching
> > +the device vendor, at offset 0x2C in its PCI configuration space
> > +header.
> > +
> > +Devices CAN present \field{vendor_id} that does not match
> > +either the PCI Vendor ID or the PCI Subsystem Vendor ID.
> > +
> > +Devices CAN present multiple Vendor data capabilities with
> > +either different or identical \field{vendor_id} values.
> > +
> > +The value \field{vendor_id} MUST NOT equal 0x1AF4.
> > +
> > +The size of the Vendor data capability MUST be a multiple of 4 bytes.
> > +
> > +Reads of the Vendor data capability by the driver MUST NOT have any
> > +side effects.
> > +
> > +\drivernormative{\subsection}{Vendor data capability}{Virtio
> > +Transport Options / Virtio Over PCI Bus / PCI Device Layout /
> > +Vendor data capability}
> > +
> > +The driver SHOULD NOT use the Vendor data capability except
> > +for debugging and reporting purposes.
>
> Every vendor is free to mess up the device behavior by adding more to this
> than the spec defines. Still, I'm undecided if this shouldn't be stronger.
>
> Jan
>
> > +
> > +The driver MUST qualify the \field{vendor_id} before
> > +interpreting or writing into the Vendor data capability.
> > +
> > \subsubsection{PCI configuration access capability}\label{sec:Virtio Transport Options / Virtio Over PCI Bus / PCI Device Layout / PCI configuration access capability}
> > The VIRTIO_PCI_CAP_PCI_CFG capability
> >
>
> --
> Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RDA IOT SES-DE
> Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-25 8:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-28 10:55 [virtio] [PATCH] content: add vendor specific cfg type Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-11-24 12:32 ` [virtio] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-11-25 7:45 ` [virtio] Re: [virtio-dev] " Jan Kiszka
2019-11-25 8:11 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2019-11-27 7:59 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-11-27 10:59 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-11-27 13:23 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-11-27 14:43 ` Cornelia Huck
[not found] ` <F1C6DEC9-5E4D-464A-A0C3-D8E625D53F7E@redhat.com>
2019-11-27 21:17 ` [virtio] Re: [virtio-comment] " Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191125025608-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=virtio-comment@lists.oasis-open.org \
--cc=virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org \
--cc=virtio@lists.oasis-open.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.