diff for duplicates of <20191128010001.GJ22227@linux.intel.com> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index 8f5d5de..d459ff9 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ other bugs, i.e. T2 has its own reference, then refcount >= 2. > > Yes, you are correct. > But on the above case, kvm_put_kvm{,_no_destroy}() would be called -> with refcount = 1, and if reorder patch is applied, it would not cause +> with refcount == 1, and if reorder patch is applied, it would not cause > any use-after-free error, even on kvm_put_kvm() case. > > Is the above correct? diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index 39ad7fb..486a19b 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ "ref\041fe3962ce1f1d5f61db5f5c28584f68ad66b2b1.camel@linux.ibm.com\0" "From\0Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>\0" "Subject\0Re: [PATCH] KVM: Add separate helper for putting borrowed reference to kvm\0" - "Date\0Thu, 28 Nov 2019 01:00:01 +0000\0" + "Date\0Wed, 27 Nov 2019 17:00:01 -0800\0" "To\0Leonardo Bras <leonardo@linux.ibm.com>\0" "Cc\0Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>" Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org> @@ -81,11 +81,11 @@ "> \n" "> Yes, you are correct. \n" "> But on the above case, kvm_put_kvm{,_no_destroy}() would be called\n" - "> with refcount = 1, and if reorder patch is applied, it would not cause\n" + "> with refcount == 1, and if reorder patch is applied, it would not cause\n" "> any use-after-free error, even on kvm_put_kvm() case.\n" "> \n" "> Is the above correct?\n" "\n" No, see above. -ab6aaa99718a4bbc86a7d3338b82028805a2c989033c43fc4ab69f68732a662e +358ed0fb03743cfb190f9a1d74083f6ceab37893d187f55129678b7c3d735618
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.