All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
Cc: Michael Roth <mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] qga: fence guest-set-time if hwclock not available
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2019 13:49:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191128134932.5ef30a30.cohuck@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191128124532.GF248361@redhat.com>

On Thu, 28 Nov 2019 12:45:32 +0000
Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 01:36:58PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > The Posix implementation of guest-set-time invokes hwclock to
> > set/retrieve the time to/from the hardware clock. If hwclock
> > is not available, the user is currently informed that "hwclock
> > failed to set hardware clock to system time", which is quite
> > misleading. This may happen e.g. on s390x, which has a different
> > timekeeping concept anyway.
> > 
> > Let's check for the availability of the hwclock command and
> > return QERR_UNSUPPORTED for guest-set-time if it is not available.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > 
> > Not sure if that is the correct approach, but the current error
> > message is really quite confusing.  
> 
> I guess the alternative is to just #ifndef __s390x__ the whole
> impl of the qmp_guest_set_time  method, but I don't have a
> strong opinion on which is best.

This hardcodes this as a s390x specialty, though, and I'm not sure that
assumption is and will stay correct.

> 
> > 
> > Gave it a quick test with an s390x and an x86_64 guest; invoking
> > 'virsh domtime <value>' now fails with 'not currently supported'
> > on s390x and continues to work as before on x86_64.
> > 
> > ---
> >  qga/commands-posix.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/qga/commands-posix.c b/qga/commands-posix.c
> > index 1c1a165daed8..bd298a38b716 100644
> > --- a/qga/commands-posix.c
> > +++ b/qga/commands-posix.c
> > @@ -149,6 +149,13 @@ int64_t qmp_guest_get_time(Error **errp)
> >     return tq.tv_sec * 1000000000LL + tq.tv_usec * 1000;
> >  }
> >  
> > +static int check_hwclock_available(const char *path)
> > +{
> > +    struct stat st;
> > +
> > +    return (stat(path, &st) < 0) ? 0 : 1;
> > +}
> > +
> >  void qmp_guest_set_time(bool has_time, int64_t time_ns, Error **errp)
> >  {
> >      int ret;
> > @@ -156,6 +163,17 @@ void qmp_guest_set_time(bool has_time, int64_t time_ns, Error **errp)
> >      pid_t pid;
> >      Error *local_err = NULL;
> >      struct timeval tv;
> > +    const char *hwclock_path = "/sbin/hwclock";
> > +    static int hwclock_available = -1;
> > +
> > +    if (hwclock_available < 0) {
> > +        hwclock_available = check_hwclock_available(hwclock_path);  
> 
> Could do this inline with:
> 
>     hwclock_available = (access(hwclock_available, X_OK) == 0);
> 
> getting a slightly better result as this check for it being
> executable as well as existing.

Yes, that looks better. Can do if we agree on this approach.

> 
> > +    }
> > +
> > +    if (!hwclock_available) {
> > +        error_setg(errp, QERR_UNSUPPORTED);
> > +        return;
> > +    }
> >  
> >      /* If user has passed a time, validate and set it. */
> >      if (has_time) {
> > @@ -195,7 +213,7 @@ void qmp_guest_set_time(bool has_time, int64_t time_ns, Error **errp)
> >  
> >          /* Use '/sbin/hwclock -w' to set RTC from the system time,
> >           * or '/sbin/hwclock -s' to set the system time from RTC. */
> > -        execle("/sbin/hwclock", "hwclock", has_time ? "-w" : "-s",
> > +        execle(hwclock_path, "hwclock", has_time ? "-w" : "-s",
> >                 NULL, environ);
> >          _exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
> >      } else if (pid < 0) {
> > -- 
> > 2.21.0
> > 
> >   
> 
> Regards,
> Daniel



  reply	other threads:[~2019-11-28 13:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-28 12:36 [PATCH RFC] qga: fence guest-set-time if hwclock not available Cornelia Huck
2019-11-28 12:45 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2019-11-28 12:49   ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2019-11-28 14:41     ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2019-11-28 14:06   ` Laszlo Ersek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191128134932.5ef30a30.cohuck@redhat.com \
    --to=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.